Thanks changeset/187424993

The nodes seem fine, but the relations seem like a mistake

Any objection to these relations being deleted?

Hey, this looks pretty broken, do you know where it was meant to be? way/1465226689

I've just noticed the shop was reopened in changeset/185542668

I'll restore the fuel station, thank you

Do you know if Shell was closed permanently? It's open on the Shell website, and Fuel Finder. node/2363540197

Sorry

I don't know what you mean by "openstreetmap API", I'm not being pedantic, there are many APIs, most of which aren't OSM APIs, but APIs to access OSM data.

@Darren in your comment you say "car park shows up as Atherleigh Way when you are on it", I'm missing some context, what shows you as being on Atherleigh Way?

We don't typically "map for the renderer", it's usually best to fix the software. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Thank you

Hey, what is image=6643145 meant to represent? Is there a URL we can use?

way/118900779

Thank you note/5118342

way/1447622966

Was this meant to be highway=services or highway=service? surface=path is also questionable.

Was this intentional? I can't see it on Esri.

way/1474096525

If it was, it should probably be highway=service. If it wasn't, it should be removed.

JOSM actively complains about `area` being added to these so it does cause some confusion there.

I've argued services and rest_area should be added to osm2pgsql example configs to try and raise awareness there too. It didn't really go anywhere.

I find this a bit questionable, highway=services has always been a polygon. Same with highway=rest_area. highway=bus_stop and highway=stop have always been points.

I know this is an issue with some software (including osm2pgsql example config) but I don't think it's a data issue.

This changeset seems to have added bus stops where someone else has half removed them.

Eg
node/2250383125
node/13285042217

Are these OK to be merged?

This is so long ago I can't remember the details, but it does look like FSA still have "Marshcombe Shute", so I probably copied it from there.

https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/541080

FSA was one of the only source we could use for addresses, it is self reported by the venue and the data is released under the OGL.

"Postcode look-up" probably isn't a source we can use for OSM, depending on what exactly you mean.

Recently the council has released council addresses under the OGL, so we can use them as a source for OSM too. The council has (the residential address) as: "Accommodation At, Yarbridge Inn, Yarbridge, Brading, Sandown, Isle Of Wight, PO36 0AA"

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/current_list_of_assigned_council

So yeah, I'd now call this:
addr:housename=Yarbridge Inn
addr:street=Yarbridge
addr:suburb=Brading
addr:city=Sandown
addr:county=Isle of Wight
addr:country=GB

I expect the southmost one (node/10083312695#map=19/50.623826/-1.174582&layers=N) will be accessable again in summer, but we will see.

tag war?