OpenStreetMap
ChrissW-R1's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181764325 | Please check note/5264537 |
|
| 163012313 | Please check note/5260303 |
|
| 25548566 | Thank you very much for the correction. |
|
| 178184828 | Re-added in changeset/181537676 After re-check the the wiki site of place=region and place=locality, I decided to continue to tag it as region. |
|
| 178184828 | Okay, fair enough, you’re certainly right about the very unclear and dubious boundaries. So a node is entirely reasonable. My goal isn’t to force this relation into the database. Rather, I simply think it makes sense to include it in the database as a landmark. A relation has the advantage over a node of also representing the area’s extent. All in all, I would now add it as a node. |
|
| 181513513 | Please check note/5256150 |
|
| 181499764 | Please check note/5256142 |
|
| 178184828 | This is by no means "arbitrary". The region is clearly documented in numerous sources. Only its exact boundaries are disputed. |
|
| 181423521 | Please check note/5254363 |
|
| 181456560 | Which are these empty multipolygons? |
|
| 181452452 | Which are these empty multipolygon? |
|
| 181416648 | Which are these empty multipolygons? |
|
| 181413745 | Which are these empty multipolygons? |
|
| 181472332 | See note/5228278 |
|
| 173979868 | Please check note/5254266 |
|
| 133106398 | The same goes for me. I will continue my QA work. If this turns out to be a problem, it needs to be addressed by the DWG. “not half-ass it and leave it to us to clean up.”
|
|
| 133106398 | See also discussion in changeset/181170306 |
|
| 181170306 | That may well be true, but it is not my job to punish someone; that is the responsibility of the Data Working Group (DWG).
|
|
| 181170306 | No matter how stubborn we might be in these cases, these “SPAM” changesets will never stop. Therefore, it’s better to make use of this data than to keep it as junk in our database. The other option would be to delete the data, which wouldn’t help anyone either. However, if this continues to concern you, you can contact the DWG at any time. |
|
| 181134721 | Please check note/5245934 |