Most of the relations seem to have come through okay, though there was some weirdness in the Bus 63 route master relation that I fixed.

The problem with this changeset is that when you split US-2 at the intersection, you didn't bring *any* of the road attributes over to the new one-way segments -- not even the name of the road.

Have they finished re-building the bridge? Last I heard, construction wasn't scheduled to be finished until sometime next year.

You appear to have merged five different features in Noxon to produce a single post office/church/museum/town/fire station. What happened?

OpenStreetMap is about mapping what's there, not what we wish was there.

Not every use of the name "Forest" is wrong. You removed the name from two roads, a building, and a city district.

I've reverted this changeset.

It would be useful to know what roads have been changed and why, particularly when you're bumping a road's importance by two grades, or adding a major road that doesn't show up in any aerial imagery.

Could you please be more careful? When you updated the alignment, you deleted the lane count, speed limit, and other useful information from the existing section of road.

Four errors:

1) A patio roof mapped as a separate building.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) A building outline showing a courtyard that doesn't exist.
4) A temporary tent mapped as a permanent building.

*Sigh*

Is there a reason why you added pedestrian crossings in the middle of nowhere in Canada and the United States?

You've tagged a power line as a primary road here. I've undone it, but please be more careful in the future.

I've reverted this changeset.

I've reverted this changeset. Just like last time, the things you deleted were correctly labeled as private driveways.

Two of the three things you deleted were marked as "private driveway", not "road". The correct thing to do would have been to mark the third one as a private driveway as well.

The "description" field is intended for information that doesn't fit in the structured tags, such as what sort of real estate services are offered. It's not a place to write a promotional blurb for your business.

Three errors:

1) Removal of "building=apartments" tags from two buildings.
2) Mapping four buildings as one.
3) A building outline is about 25% larger than the building.

Three errors:

1) A building missing a quarter of its outline.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) Three buildings mapped as one.

Two errors:

1) A building missing a corner
2) Two buildings mapped as one.

When used carefully, inspecting each candidate building against appropriate imagery to ensure that it (1) exists and (2) is traced properly, RapID is an accepted tool.

When using it as you are, importing buildings at rates in excess of one per second, it falls solidly under the import guidelines.

And shifting the burden of error checking onto me is unacceptable. It takes about five minutes to inspect each changeset, or longer if I need to fix anything. The 600 or so changesets you've made in the past day will take me about a month to review if everything is perfect; given the number of errors I've found so far, three to four months is a more reasonable estimate.

Please read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines and the rest of osm.wiki/Category:Import_Policy -- the standard for imports is "guilty until proven innocent".

I'd prefer not to revert it myself -- the Data Working Group has better tools and more experience than I do.

The change I feel necessary is to revert everything you've done since changeset #111471825 as an undiscussed import. Do you agree?