A footway in such a topo map relates to a narrow, often unmarked and unbitten single trail, unlike a "path" which specifies a marked and bitten.
This holds great importance when hiking by foot.
I hope this answers suffices in elaborating what should be regard as common knowledge.

Hello all.
Editing made due to misunderstanding, assuming duplications.
I edited again to recover and connect said trails.
Please mind the importance of marking bike trail with their purposed dashed line, not to be confused with overlapping duplicated foot paths.

Hello all.
I admit not being aware to this route importance to other users. I apologize and will understand it's recovery.

I also feel the need to explain the reasons for editing should you see fit to read:
'Nahal Nekarot' bike trail followed the main marked trail at the same geographical corridor, creating unnecessary routs clutter, confusing foot hikers and holds no actual benefit to bikers whom would ride where they see fit as thy go regardless.
The main 'Double' marked trail is sufficient for every navigation (foot, bike or car), mapping every single variation in the same corridor will lead to endless overflowing process.

The disconnections were made by mistake and i have tried edit again and reconnect them.