OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
181959183

I believe Tulsa's currently not installing anything less than 6 feet wide, and most everything south of the tracks is likely at least 7... I'd recommend actually measuring.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181959183

181959183

This seems unreasonably narrow... like these just about have to be at least six feet wide or I wouldn't be able to bike down them at any speed. Did you actually measure this or did you just Google the minimum federal standard width for a bicycle lane?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181959183

183131775

We don't delete roads just because they're private, we put access=private on them instead.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183131775

182766067

Looked like there were additional foot and bicycle keys set that I took care of.

182780878

A lack of value is the same as an unknown value, so deleting "through" actually made this less specific.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182780878

182766067

So this is a private path that's open to the public if they're on foot?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182766067

182602627

So instead of being on the north side of 89th next to the road east of Clear Springs Road, it's in someone's back yard on the other side of both roads now?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182602627

182544422

Google is not a valid source due to copyright issues.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182544422

182533255

It's worth adding street names on sidewalks if you know the name, it helps with pedestrian directions.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182533255

182295645

crossing=unmarked#United_States

182331841

Splits should happen at the physical gore, not the start of the lane.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182331841

182295645

crossing=unmarked is deprecated in favor of crossing:markings=no. It's pretty common in some parts of the US for crossings to never have markings, even if they're at traffic signals, for example.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182295645

182273800

If this is on the mast-arm, the camera is likely the video traffic detection camera for the signal controller and not a flock camera.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182273800

182261485

Updated to a sports center for roller skating (the closest to "roller rink" I could come up with).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182261485

182259475

If there's no lane markings, then remove lanes=2 and add lane_markings=no

lanes=*#No_lane_markings
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182259475

182046787

The abandoned railroad you deleted probably should be restored and gone over, since there's decent lengths along that which the track scar is still visible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182046787

167931732

Updated.

167931732

OK, but then someone else will just remap it because they see it on the aerial still.

182004181

What's the correct name? Looks like the street name was simply removed, with no new name tag or noname tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182004181

182004528

Looks like detail-mapped parking was removed in favor of very crudely mapped parking areas that include a lot of not-parking objects, and not all of the detail mapped parking has been removed.

Did you want to remap it like the parking around Crest Foods, or is it OK for me to revert?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182004528