This is just complete slop... you're a professional, maybe consider improving the quality instead of making more work for others?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178968567

I'm at a loss as to how you invented a second redundant road when lane tagging is what is needed there.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178969535

Mind cleaning this up? I've seen drunk people draw straighter lines and I'm pretty sure the lanes also got updated.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179733788

Not at all.

I meant more in terms of best practice, it's best to include the street name if it's missing.

Street names on sidewalks are extremely useful to pedestrians (especially blind).
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179151868

You forgot the through lanes and the placement tags.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179706206

County road numbers would be ref, not name, same as other highway numbers.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179410687

Were you trying to create a new US 70 Business? Because you modified the historic tag, and the changeset comments didn't provide a hint.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179413559

Please try to map new streets with the ways connected how one would reasonably predict names to be added. This allows other tools like StreetComplete to be more readily used by people adding the street names in the field.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179673235

Not exactly sure where you're getting curves out of an obviously square-cornered driveway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179376962

Hold up... residential roads are like, neighborhood streets, not people's private driveways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179399154

Wow. We really live in a backwards craphole, don't we?

So public property with differing jurisidictions at either end. At a minimum, pointing out that it could be signed better at the intersection to clarify access before committing to it would probably be smart.

OK, well, with the absence of signage, I think it's mapped right for now, though isn't it public access at both ends by virtue of being a public park and a city cycleway at the other end? Might be something to bring up with your city councilor.

No, it's literally how the street's named. Bixby and Tulsa just tend to have inconsistently crap signage. Within BA, Tulsa and Bixby, everything starts with North/South and ends with East/West, with the name sandwiched in between.

I'll need some Mapillary or Panoramax imagery from the ground to really get this right. From above it still looks like a dedicated two-lane cycleway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179281889

The "Avenue" almost always comes before "East" in the name, even if we usually short_name it 86th East...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179368850

The "Avenue" almost always comes before "East" in the name, even if we usually short_name it 86th East...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179368850

Thanks for the heads up, I'm taking a look at this in JOSM now since this is going to be next to impossible to fix in id.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179370984