Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently added bridge=yes and layer=1 to 4km of highway, Way: 364596862 and Way: 1075628524. A 4km long bridge!?

No worry though I've sectioned off the actual bridges and removed the bridge tags from the ordinary road sections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, motorway removed as it's incorrectly mapped.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've mapped two footpaths here, they cross over and several times join onto the main highway, which cannot be correct. There are 34 warnings given above about these paths. Could you please make corrections as this disrupts routing?

The paths follow the line of the main highway, I wonder if you mean the main highway allows foot use along it?

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've tagged the track Way: 38977648 as foot=yes which implies that there is public access on foot here. I wonder if this is correct as it looks to be a farm track only?

I've removed the layer=-1 tag from Way: Bingham Linear Park (38962717) as it's not needed. I also corrected the layer tags on the bridges to layer=1 thus indicating they are above the old railway.

You've added the tags cutting=yes
and embankment=yes to Way: Bingham Linear Park (38946842), this can't logically be correct, it's one or the other, or none. It looks like this section is slightly raised so I've removed the cutting=yes tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You haven't messed up, just went a bit astray on learning, all is OK.

I can't determine where the Community Garden is so I can't add it. If it is added the tagging must be accurate as to who is allowed access and when.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

I've reverted these changes as they are incorrect. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Quite a few problems including duplicated sections of highway and several highways joined to area outlines. I think I've fixed them all.

Regards Bernard.

Several amendments.

Hi, the correct tags were on the POI, I've moved them to the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags here, 18 Sadler Close is not the house name.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've somehow got the wrong place. You placed the shop POI in Cambridge UK.

Could you please amend the location, if you need help please just comment here.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made some amendments to your house and removed fiction and personal details. Please stick to OSM good practice, need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your changes result in several duplicated highways and other highways dragged out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the no exit tag from the High Street as it would disrupt the traffic flow.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think the building comprises four houses so not a semi-detached house. Thus as it is undivided the correct tag for the feature is building=residential. I've amended it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I noticed you've added a barrier on the oneway Mitchell Street.

Are you sure this is correct? Because it now makes the road a no exit for vehicles. Which on a oneway street is not logical.

Could you amend please? Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This building looks like it's more than one house so the tag would be building=residential. Unless of course you map all the individual dwellings then they are all tagged building=house.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made a few minor tweaks to the outlines. The only big problem was the community_centre being joined to the underground railway. An easy mistake to make, I've unjoined them.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Being a residential area this feature looks more like a prank than a bank, thus I've removed it.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You made a few duplications of highways here. Don't worry I think I've corrected everything.

Regards Bernard.