Hi, I've removed the improbable name. Names in OSM should be the formal verifiable names.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the access is to the farm then it's tagged access=agricultural, also it looks very much like a made-up track rather than a path. I've added the gate as well as made minor amendments.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I'm sorry about that, not intentional, but a serious inadvertent click of the mouse. I've reverted the changeset to as it was before my slip up.

I was removing self-intersections from the building outlines and must have accidentally (orthogonalised) straightened out all the lines. Anyway, you can now see the problems I was trying to correct. The second house from the south has a self-intersection of its outline. The fourth house from the south has a node that draws its outline over the third from the south house.

I've left the problems so you can see them, I'll correct them later or you can correct them if you wish.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
In my opinion, the highway is a gated road. It is signed at the east end to indicate it as being such. There are at least two "cattle gates, please close" across the road. This knowledge is gained from sources not allowed in OSM.

The western section is named as "Highgate Lane" on OS OpenData StreetView.

Thomas Jarvis may have more local knowledge.

Regards Bernard.

If you could please respond to this comment perhaps we could discuss the issues mentioned above.

Please don't keep duplicating highways.

Hello, I see you are still duplicating highways and tagging them as permissive. Both of these actions are incorrect. Duplicating highways, (placing one atop another) as well as being incorrect severely disrupts proper routing.
For the access=permissive tag on all these highways, I would ask does all traffic have to gain permission before using these highways? Or is access publicly available without seeking permission? If access is freely available then the access=permissive ought be removed.

With regard to the above comments, have you been back over your previous changesets and made appropriate regard/action on the comments there.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed some roads because they were duplicates. I'm not sure if all the newly added tags are correct.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No, you can't change comments made here. It doesn't matter though most are not noticed.

I've tweaked the park and water areas to the Bing imagery, looks OK now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow added a bridge tag to the whole of footpath Way: 575662272 when adding the bridge section. No problem I've removed the tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed some roads because they were duplicates. I'm not sure if all the newly added tags are correct.

Hi, I've removed some roads because they were duplication.

Hi, I've removed some roads because they were duplication.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Nice work, you've learned how to map very quickly, it's a shame that you've put effort into nonsense though. There's a lot that needs properly mapping around this area. If you need any help please just ask.

I've reverted the fiction so no harm done.

Regards Bernard.

Hi there, I just wanted to point out that something went a bit awry. There were three instances of duplicated edges reported on OSM Inspector this morning:- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.21600&lat=57.15419&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges (they will be gone tomorrow). On looking closer they were three duplicated sections of highways. In each case, both ways were uploaded by yourself. I assumed you had deleted and redrew them as all history in each case, of both ways, was attributed to yourself, but I'm not sure of that on now reflecting. Anyway, each of the three highways was duplicated, a highway with a second highway on top of the first.

All is well now. I only noticed it because every day I go over the UK and other parts of the world sorting out duplicated sections of highways. I hope it's a useful contribution.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've tagged the building as residential as it's made up of several houses rather than being a single house.

Hi, Duplicated highways were removed but the new tagging looks like it might need amending.

Hi,
Please don't delete and redraw highways because it also removes the mapping history associated with the highway. It's best to amend/correct the existing ways thus keeping all history intact.

I've removed three duplicated sections of highway that you redrew but somehow duplicated.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You added bridge, footpath, and layer tags to a large boundary outline, I've reverted this change. I've made several changes to tagging, reverting a road back to a cycleway. Also tweaked outlines of buildings.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few warnings were instigated by this changeset as listed on it above.

I've made a few tweaks. Added website for the business. You somehow dragged part of Duke Street and joined it to a wall, I've reinstated Duke Street. Lastly, the Chelmsford railway stop position was dragged away inadvertently, again I've reverted the dragging.

All now good, please double-check before uploading changes as it's so easy to unknowingly make mistakes.

Regards Bernard.