Improved building shapes to imagery

I can see no evidence of the antenna on any imagery. Can you show it exists please?

Regards Bernard.

Shape squared up.

I've reinstated the tag waterway=river. please don't alter obviously correct tagging.

Regards Bernard.

The buildings could be squared up, perhaps zoom in, and better refine the shapes to actual outlines.

Regards Bernard.

Fiction removed.

An extensive duplicated highway was removed.

Hi, Almost all of your tracks are actually boundary edges of small fields. There is one track from east to west.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's incorrect to map a building within a building. Thus I've converted your building to a POI within the outline of St James House.

Regards Bernard.

Sorry, for the large bounding box, everything's OK.

Hi, for the houses, I removed your tag
name=102 The Street because that would not be the name of the house. The house number is in the address number tag, addr:housenumber=102. Same situation with the other two houses.

For the road name, I removed 102 - 106 from your tag of name=102 - 106 The Street. Because 102 - 106 is surely not part of the road name.

Your mapping was good, just not quite OSM best practice. It's all now as the database expects.

The routing to your house won't work yet because the road hasn't yet rendered. It may be sometime before delivery drivers update their navigation systems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your changes are in the OSM database, It takes a little while for new stuff to get rendered.

I've removed the (house number & road) names from the buildings and street.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed the fiction and strange shapes. I've added your new building and footpath data to the map.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, the highway shouldn't have been duplicated; that was the main reason for my edit. Rather, the existing highway should be amended, which is what I've done.

I've amended the sections of service roads, Way: 741879990 and Way: 836464309, to reflect the Public Right of Way status. I added the tags:-
designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
prow-ref=Bro Garmon Footpath 5
Thus there can be no misconstruction of the service roads' public status.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of highways where a path is mapped on top of an existing highway. The duplication could cause routing problems. It's best to amend/correct any existing feature thus the history is maintained.

Regards Bernard

Well done, but it was in Scotland in 1994. Thus I've reverted it.

Best Regards Bernard

These are garages.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The houses look much better if squared up. Thats shortcut "Q" in the ID editor you're using. I've squared uo numbers 69 and 70.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Glad to help, just ask if you need any help.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

Good to see new mappers updating OSM. Can I just point out that the OSM practice is to amend/correct any existing features, rather than draw on top or delete and redraw features. Thus your new roads are duplicating existing features.

I've transferred your new data to the existing highway lines. All good now.

Regards Bernard.