Please heed any and all warnings before given before uploading and as stated above. I've removed these two fictional motorways mainly because they duplicate an existing highway.

Hi, there are problems with self-intersecting ways here starting with Way: 1313870887

Hi, I've removed two highways that you placed on top of existing highways, Way: 1313007960 and Way: 1313007939. This duplication disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Please be advised that you've placed most of Way: 1313259461 on top of existing highways. This is highway duplication that could disrupt routing. Could you please remove your duplication.

Secondly, is the junction Queens Gardens to Storkport Road correct with button operated crossing lights?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, These areas aren't houses they are residential areas. They should be reduced to individual house areas.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, The relation should be edited, but this is not very easy to do with the iD editor. It is very easy to break a relation without realising. Can you point out which section of the path you mean and I'l try to help using the JOSM editor?

Hi, There were several sections of duplicated highways introduced to the database by this changeset. I think I've corrected all the problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is the building still an ambulance station?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's better to amend/correct existing mapped features rather than deleting and re-drawing then the complete history is kept on the feature. I've reverted your changes and corrected the existing building outlines. Thus, the information you deleted with the building outline is also reinstated.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, I don't think this building now exists, I think there are several new buildings on the site. Would you agree? If so this building should be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to have to say there is a problem here. As warned above your new building outline Way: BDT Transport (1312675201) is placed on top of an existing building, duplication. It's OSM practice that if a mapped feature needs amending or correcting the correction is done to the existing feature if possible. Thus your amendment should be made to the existing building, and then the building's mapping history is maintained in full.

I've placed your new tags on the existing building outline and removed the new duplicate building line.

Hope this helps and guides.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, The above applies to Way: 1312436749 as well which I've removed. Does the bridge Way: 1312436750 actually exist Or should this also be removed?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your informal path Way: 1312436748 was placed almost entirely on top of existing highways, this would seriously disrupt routing. Thus I've removed the path.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've unfortunately made many mistakes here. Way: 1311731991, Way: 1311731989, Way: 1311731985, Way: 1311731980, Way: 1311786965, Way: 1311731993, Way: 1311731995 had in part been placed on top of existing highways which disrupts routing. I've made many corrections.

Way: 1311786939, Way: 1311731992, Way: 442062624 were wrong in many ways so I've removed them.

I've corrected bridges, and added some.

A lot of your areas (grass), are joined to highway centerlines which is incorrect. Grass or woods do not extend across main highways.

You've mapped many nodes as highway=crossing where there are no formal crossings.

With 150+ ways in this changeset it's difficult for you to check your work before uploading. Please consider limiting the number of changes in a changeset to maybe 10 to 15, then you can easily check for mistakes.

Regards Bernard.

Removed footpath as it duplicates another highway. Removed steps tag

Hi, self intersections removed, buildings joined at party walls, all squared up.

Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is some access to these paths so it's incorrect to just say access=no. There is access on foot and being agricultural land there would be agricultural access. You would need to define the type of access that is not allowed before saying access=no. I've amended or removed your access=no tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hello,

There are many warnings given above, several of these warnings could be mapping that could cause disruption to routing. Could you please look at and try to fix some of the problems?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, It looks like your landcover tag is being used wrongly, the areas you've mapped are actually individual trees or tree lines as you've previously accepted. As such OSM practice says they should be nodes or linear features not area features. Whatever you add to OSM should be correct ground truth and verifiably. So features of temporary or personal nature should not be added. Thus the landcover tagged areas should be removed.

You can map temporary or personal features with JOSM and save them without uploading to the OSM database. Perhaps you could use this method ASAP to hold the landcover features for you future use.

OSM is a live worldwide database from which thousands of maps are compiled. Other users have a right to expect it to be consistent, so I'll continue to correct anyones mapping in order to better OSM.

Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the footpaths, also added layer tags to the bridges.