Duplicated highway removed.

Hello,
As you can see from the warnings above you are duplicating highways which then disrupts routing. Please do not place a highway on top of an existing highway.

If an existing highway needs amending/correcting it is OSM good practice to amend/correct the existing highway. Not to place a second highway on top of an existing one.

I've removed the duplicates that I can see. Please now make your corrections to the existing ways. This will keep all the history intact.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted these changes because they seem to only remove the building tags from several buildings. If you can explain what you were trying to do maybe I can help?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder does The Car Edition operate from the whole of that building? If not then the building should be split into the separate units and The Car Edition placed on its unit. Alternatively the business should be a placed on a node appropriately placed within the building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted your changes to this highway as they don't seem to reflect ground truth. This is a surfaced unclassified highway which has no restrictions as to public use. Although there are no formal passing places vehicles can pass each other with just a little patience.

You could add a note tag giving your opinion of the highway but please stick to ground truth and legal status, (don't tag as customers only that means the general public are not allowed).

Regards Bernard.

Just a nudge to let you know this one has yet to be fixed, I think on the other one you said both were fixed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've removed the fictional motorway.

Hi, Glad to help, there's a lot for you to learn.

It's OK to tag the paths as access=private, but only if the public are denied access.

For the paths through buildings, section off the path and tag as foot=yes
highway=footway
tunnel=building_passage, I've done two so you can see the method.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, 1-13 Albert Close is a description rather than a formal name. I've amended the tags, the description is still within the tags.

I've tweaked some areas and reinstated the footpaths. Are there some passageways through buildings here?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Private garages would be the description of the building rather than the formal name. I've amended it to a description tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, foot=yes changed to foot=no

Hi, That's reasonable, the longer path is tagged as foot=yes is that correct, if so then are both paths foot=yes? If not then the foot=yes should be changed to foot=no. Anyway, I've tagged both paths as access=private which in OSM means no public access of any kind. Please let me know if foot access is allowed on either path.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the names from the highway nodes as I think they are fiction. All land is in some sort of ownership so it's all potentially private.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Pendower Road has somehow been duplicated here with the several route relations mismatched across the highway sections. Could you have a look please?

Regards Bernard.

Hello spiregrain, Please be aware that the two sections of the A390 here have somehow been duplicated, hence four sections of way below. The several route relations are split between the different sections. It would be difficult for me to sort out the relations when removing sections of duplicated highway so I wonder if you could please look to rectifying this problem. If not I'll have a go.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow dragged several features out of alignment as indicated by the warnings above. Please be very careful and check what you may have inadvertently moved before uploading. If you are unsure don't upload but close without uploading and start mapping again.

I've corrected all the problems.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a few questions. Has Travelosophers taken over Cyplon? if so Cyplon should be removed. Is Travelosophers an online-only business? It seems from the website that it's only online, and that the office is not actually open for face to face business.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Eman,
Looks all good now exactly what I thought from imagery. I'm not local though so I was reluctant to map itas such.

Regards & Thanks Bernard.

Hi, Regarding Way: Recreational Community Hall (916006919), I've reinstated the correct building level tag and corrected the name to English, (the building is in the UK so English is the area language).

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You made a few mistakes here which I've rectified, hedges unjoined, duplication of road sections, and making Button Lane a bridge and also adding a level crossing where there is none.

Please make sure what you upload to OSM is ground truth, other folk may well rely on correct mapping.

Regards Bernard.