Hi, When you add to a route relation (State Highway 220), it is OSM practice to use the existing sections of highways rather than making new sections to add to the route. Actually, the new highway sections that you mapped were made such that they duplicated the existing highways. Thus routing was completely disrupted.

I've removed your duplicated highways and amended the route relation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've repositioned the traffic feature.

Duplicates removed.

A few more this morning now repaired, looks good now.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've added lots of nice footpaths which is really good for OSM. Unfortunately, a lot of them are not joined to themselves or the greater highway network. Thus the new paths cannot be used for routing purposes. (Where they cross over themselves or existing highways is actually incorrect mapping.)

I'll try to correct things where I can. But it would be good if you could go over your work so far and make corrections.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to point out that the area you changed from landuse=construction to building=residential was in fact the whole construction site. I've amended the building outline to the Bing imagery. I think what was mapped as a wall is now incorporated into the building structure.

Could you check the Starbucks is still in the correct place, please?

Regards Bernard.

The problems were very complicated, highways, buildings, and boundary lines were dragged out of alignment when your new nodes were added. So each problem had to be looked at and corrected individually. So it seemed far easier for me to fix than explain. Thus I've made corrections, I think I've fixed everything. We'll know tomorrow when Geofabrik updates, I'll look again then.

Regards Bernard.

This shows the duplicated sections of highways clearly:- https://tinyurl.com/2p9ep4uc

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Unfortunately, you are introducing quite a few problems when adding these new features. Dragging highways such as to make duplicate sections that disrupt routing. Also please try to avoid joining highway features to area features adjacent to highways.

Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/mvwdchy3 I've not made any corrections so that you can see the problems. Could you please make corrections? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I think you've made a mistake here. This bar is already mapped on Charing Cross Road. Thus I've removed this POI.

Regards Bernard.

Hi Thanks for the info, would you like to correct the situation, please? Or should I do it, if so is the bridge north or south of the ford and is the track through the ford only or over the bridge as well?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There is a problem with a highway crossing the stream, Way: East Water (29093946). Here there is a highway track crossing the stream at a ford and there has been a bridge (which is also a form of highway), mapped as on top of the track. Is it a ford, a bridge or both.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've placed part of footpath Way: 1123690980 on top of an existing track making a duplicated section of highway. This could disrupt routing so I've removed your duplicate section and amended the track.

Regards Bernard.

Duplicated ford Node: 10272890485 is removed.
Regards Bernard.

Hi, Are there actually paths by the sides of these roads?

Regards Bernard.

Hello There, I've noticed on some of your changesets that there are several warnings about crossing highways and other problems (as seen above). The highway problems are a particular nuisance as they can disrupt routing.

I wonder if you've noticed these warnings and have remedied those that need correcting? If you have I apologise for mentioning it.

There is a problem with a highway crossing the stream, Way: East Water (29093946). Here there is a highway track crossing the stream at a ford and there has been a bridge (which is also a form of highway), mapped as on top of the track. Is it a ford, a bridge or both.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, One more duplication. I've removed a diplicated section of Way: 33902203

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I see from the list above that there are several resolved tags, which is good, but also 16 warnings about crossing highways/waterways. There are also 5 warnings about crossing highways. As well as some other warnings.

I would usually correct the odd mistake myself but this changeset is rather large. So could you please have a look at correcting any problems highlighted in the warnings?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Village Drive is the correct name of this highway, so the addition to the name (Canvey Island, Essex) is not needed and is not to OSM best practice. I've removed the extra names.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Canvey Island is the correct name for this place/feature. Thus I've removed the county name Essex, as Essex is mapped elsewhere.

Regards Bernard.