Hi, I've removed your path Way: 1034551073 as it is generally on top of an existing highway. As you agreed this isn't the way to map public transport routes.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I've changed to bunkers to surface=sand as it's OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, You've added a lot of duplicated roads, I've removed several of them. Could you please try to not do this again? It seriously disrupts the database and routing.

Regards Bernard,

Fictional names removed

Hi, Thanks for responding, I have actually made a few comments to some of your changesets. These comments are automatically forwarded to you via email, maybe you've not noticed them or they've gone to your spam folder.

This link shows OSM practice of address tagging:- addr=*

The tag addr:housename is "The name of a house."
The tag addr:housenumber is "The house number"
The two tags are for different features of the address and are not interchangeable. You're not supposed to put a name in the number tag nor a number in the name tag. Sheds don't usually have either a name or number.

If a property has a number and a name both can be added to the relevant tag.

I and a couple of other mappers have been so-called "going behind you". Between us, we've looked at almost all of your mapping and corrected hundreds of mistakes. I've also added the access=private tag to the private gardens. By the way that's not messing with stuff we just want OSM to be the best map in the world.

Regards Bernard.

Hello, You've now been told many times that the house numbers only go on the tag addr:housenumber=??
The house number does not go on the tag addr:housename=?? nor on the tag name=58

The residential gardens should be tagged access=private, leisure=garden. Without the private tag, gardens can be looked on as openly accessible to everyone.

Can you please rectify these problems?

Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A few problems, you've changed a building to cycle parking, I've corrected it back to apartments. I changed the shop Mazzi's name and added the website. I've squared up the new apartment building.

Regards Bernard.

Hi,
You're adding lots of features with fictional names, service highways, and buildings.
Driveways are not formally named.
Houses have house numbers, those numbers are not also the house names.
Sheds and garages do not have formal names, definitely not named with a house number.
Only verifiable data should be added to OSM.
Some driveways have duplicated sections.

Could you please rectify these problems?

Regards Bernard.

Hi There were quite a few crossing highways (paths), some crossing buildings, some joined to areas and buildings and one long duplicated section. I think I've corrected all the problems but could you please check before uploading more.

Thanks, Regards Bernard.

Duplication of highway, path removed.

Your path is a drawn on top of an existing highway. I've removed the duplication.

Regards Bernard.

Fuel tag removed from the shop.
Tweaked building outlines, squared them up.

Hi,
Several corrections to buildings.

School address tags placed on the school grounds outline as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Quite a few problems here. The building is two houses so the tag is building=residential. The level is two, Please see:- building:levels=*

You dragged a section of Drake Avenue out of alignment.

The bollard you mapped dragged a road and two area outlines out of alignment.

I've corrected all of the mentioned problems, which were by the way given as warnings above.

Regards Bernard.

Hi you placed the path on top of an existing highway making duplication of ways. I've removed the path.

You've done this before and it's incorrect mapping, please stop.

Regards Bernard.

Hi you placed the path on top of an existing highway making duplication of ways. I've removed the path.

You've done this before and it's incorrect mapping, please stop.

Regards Bernard.

Andy, perhaps more ought to be done to stop this continued damage to the OSM database.

Hi, With respect that Nathan might not be aware of the damage done here this changeset would be fictional. If Nathan is aware of the damage then this could be seen as vandalism. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

Hello Nathan, The changes you've made to these motorways doesn't really look right. You've amended the numbering such that there is now on the north and south carriageway a section numbered A23(M) between two sections numbered M23.

I can't see a reason for doing this so I'm reverting the changes. If you have a reason for making this change perhaps you could comment here for discussion.

Regards Bernard.

Hello Nathan, It's good to have new folk editing OSM but the editing should conform to OSM best practice. There seems to be no reason to change the names and reference numbers of these trunk roads. Thus I'm reverting all the changes. If I'm wrong in doing this please comment here giving reasons for your changes.

If there's something particular you're trying to achieve again please comment here. Perhaps help can be offered.

Regards Bernard.