Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you know the road is open for use, please change the tag to highway=residential and remove the construction tag.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the landuse=residential as the building is within an area tagged thus.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I agree with the name change, but is it really 20mph?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've squared up and tweaked the buildings. I also joined the church path to the road.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I haven't heard from you, so I've removed all the untagged objects.

Regards Bernard.

Please try not to duplicate highways.

Regards Bernard.

Also removed Way: 1465070703, Way: 1465070704 and Way: 1465070705, same reason as above.

Duplicated highway Way: 1465070702 removed because it could disrupt routing.

Hi pitscheplatsch,
I hadn't noticed that, yes I agree it doesn't;t belong there, I've removed it from the relation.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, I take it then that you want to learn more on how to fix problems, so I'll try to explain what has happened with your Changeset: 176977317.

You've removed Way: 1465080775, which was an outer way of Relation: Coed Rheidol National Nature Reserve (20055810), leaving it as an untagged polygon. Was Way: 1465080775 supposed to still be an outer of the NNR?

Way: 1465080781, Way: 1465080780, Way: 1465080772, Way: 1465080773 and Way: 1465080774, that where inners of Way: 1465080775 (mentioned above), are now untagged self intersecting polygons. I think these should be removed.

Lastly Way: 1465080775 has a section of it's outline at north that extends about 500m in a thin strip following the River Rheidol. I think it's likely that this strip should be removed.

If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think the business would be sited in the middle of a road, that's a bit dangerous for customers. Your website places the business at The Old Chapel, could you please correct the position?

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.

I've removed several duplicated highways because they could disrupt routing. Please check before uploading.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, There are several inners to the relation Coed Rheidol National Nature Reserve (20055810). All are untagged; some are self-intersecting. They seem to be along the river line. The self intersections need correcting. Could some description be added to the inners?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There's no point in advertising in the comments; they are not part of any OSM map. You are better off adding a website tag.

I've made the business a POI within that building, reverting the building tags back to original state. Reason being that the business is not the whole building.

Regards Bernard,

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added the marina tags.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, you've got some strangely shaped buildings here, shortcut Q in iD edited to square up buildings. Also lots of buildings and gardens overlapping. I think the gardens ought to be tagged as access=private.

Just ask if you need any help.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The business isn't a building within a building so I've created it as a POI node.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OSM.

I've removed the maxspeed=80 mph tag from Way: Kilburn Road (193557493) as that is obviously wrong past the school grounds.

I amended the school name to Haywoods Oakham School.

I capitalized the building name to Little Wharflands.

I made tweaks to building outlines as some had dragged nodes.

Kilburn Road needs a speed tag, is it 20mph?

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Have you actually seen the man-made camera mount for surveillance? If not then it's not verifiable as per OSM mapping practice, osm.wiki/Verifiability

A lot of land owners now put up signs saying "CCTV in Operation" that doesn't mean there is a camera in operation. It's the same as the sign "Bull in Field" when there's none present.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

From the other house numbers this would logically be number 1, I've corrected.

Regards Bernard.