BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171884761 | Hi, You inadvertently squared up the long boundary line Way: 449518772. I've reinstated it to the original position so all is well. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171788026 | Hi, I just wanted to point out, in case you missed it, that there are several problems in this changeset as noted in the warnings above. I've removed several sections of duplicated cycleway which could have impacted on routing. I've not looked at the other problems. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171803156 | Hi, The church building is alreaddy mapped so I've added you new tags to it. OSM policy is "One feature, one OSM element", please see:- osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171795177 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM maps ground truth, what is physically present at a place, and it must be verifiable to others who pass by. So I wonder, is there actually a language school here or is it an office in the bungalow? I can see no evidence of a school. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171771732 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The business doesn't occupy the whole building, so I've reverted the building tags. I added the tag office=financial to your POI. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171757952 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Good start to your mapping, that's actually two houses, I've amended. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171713040 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I made several alterations to your added footpaths mainly to conform to OSM best practice. There were many crossing but unjoined highways, (footpaths crossing over existing highways unjoined), all fixed. Many places where footpaths joined onto land area outlines, (residential and building area outlines), all fixed. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171665342 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you made this amendment at the wrong place, so I've reverted it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 158443408 | Hi, I forgot to say that yes I agree the path line looks very strange. It's also joined to many other land features which is poor mapping. |
|
| 158443408 | Hi, This changeset merely removed the section of highway (path) that coincided with the bridge (Way: Amjilosa to Sekathum (1328739649), which was a duplication of the highway. It made very minimal changes to the positions of six nodes. The bridge was originally added in Changeset: 96218307, four years ago. My changes were to the existing mapping. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171562119 | Hi, you've somehow mapped a lot of features near here that are not tagged. Could you please rectify this issue? Regards Bernard |
|
| 171489823 | Hi, Thanks for the info, I've now tagged it as a house and added a note of the former use. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171489823 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If the building remains it ought not be deleted. Rather the tags for the closed amenity should be changed to disused. I think the building remains so I've reinstated it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171392733 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The AED position in the middle of these woods far from public access or any highway or habitation, seems strange. It's far from the Norfolk Show Ground. You tag as access=yes, but by whom, when, and how? Thus the question, is this position correct? Who, how and when can it be accessed? Need help please just ask.
|
|
| 171344309 | Hi, I've removed the duplicated sections of highway you added as it could disrupt routing. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171313465 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately your new highway duplicated the existing highway which cause problems with routing. Thus I've reverted this changeset, all is now OK. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171156504 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Regards Bernard. |
|
| 171156728 | Highways don't need a postcode. |
|
| 171156652 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The house would not be situated in the middle of and joined to the highway. I've made it a node beside the highway. You can move it to the appropriate position. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 170994617 | Hi, I've removed the fiction you added to OSM. |