BCNorwich's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 165689243 | Hi, I've removed several more duplicated sections of highways: Way: 1382828815, Way: 1382828798, part of Way: 608428939, Way: 1382828802, Way: 1382828807. Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. |
|
| 165626751 | I've removed two more sections of highway: way/1382530556 and way/1382530560. Please don't duplicate highways, as it's incorrect and could disrupt routing. |
|
| 165626751 | Duplicated sections of highways Way: 1382530552, Way: 1382530553, Way: 1382530554 are removed. |
|
| 165689243 | Duplicated highway Way: 1382828809 removed. |
|
| 164632611 | Hi, If there's no common name for a path or any feature then the name= tag should not be added. Only formal and verifiable name should be added to OSM. So the paths are OK with no name. Regards Bernard, Sorry for any confusion. |
|
| 164632210 | No response, so I've moved the path to a gap in the waterway indicating a crossing point, added a bridge. |
|
| 165630526 | Hi, I've removed several sections of duplicated highways in this area. Please be careful not to duplicate highways as it disrupts routing. Regards. |
|
| 165595251 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your POI "My Home" is really of no value to OSM and would not be verifiable by other folk passing by. I've removed the POI and added the outlines of the two houses as seen on imagery. You can now add details of your home, remember though that My Home is not the formal name. Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165430535 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Genuine features only should be mapped, can you please show verification of the new castle? I the meantime I've removed it. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165433909 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you please say what leads you to believe that pedestrian use is not allowed on these sections of highways? Regards Bernard. |
|
| 102777791 | Crikey, that was 4 years ago, I've fixed the numbers. Thanks for letting me know. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165218862 | Utility poles are no use without some description of their use. |
|
| 165219251 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've removed highway Way: 1379232753 because it duplicates the line of an existing highway and could cause disruption to routing. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165078360 | My mistake, I've reinstated the woodland. |
|
| 165136795 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Reffereing to your three changesets. Unfortunately, all your added highways duplicate existing highways, resulting in the warnings given above. This duplication could seriously disrupt routing. Thus, I've reverted the changes. Please read the guidance in the help section above. Also take heed of any warnings when uploading data. You may then be able to avoid duplicating highways. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165103210 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for the addition to OSM. However, there's no need to draw a second building that's just duplication. You did place your new tags on the existing building outline, which was correct. I've removed the duplicate building, all OK now. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165074768 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Features that are on the ground truth and verifiable by other folk passing by are features that can be added to the OSM database. Whether they are official or not is a matter of no consequence. The paths you removed can be seen on aerial imagery and as such can be on OSM. If they exist they can be mapped. Thus I've reinstated the paths. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165002570 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your new highway, Way: 1377897003, duplicated existing highways, which could have caused disruption to routing. Thus, I've removed it. If a way needs correcting please correct any existing way. I also corrected the playground area to within the highways. Regards Bernard. |
|
| 165041901 | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for adding the AED. Is that defibrillator fixed to the wall of the community_centre? Or is it fixed to a post or wall beside the footpath? Regards Bernard. |
|
| 164967801 | Hi,
If it's a single oneway road then one of the roads should be removed. If its a dual carraigeway road with both roads going the same way then the roads should be separated. Obviously, something is wrong, could you please make a correction? Your note says to refer to Google Maps, please remember that using Google Maps must not be used to map in OSM, it breaks Google copyright. Regards Bernard. |