What did you do here and most importantly, why?
* You deleted the new service road (1423865502). It is still there.
* You deleted the ridge (1246175434). I'm quite sure it is still there.
* You deleted the snowmobile path (33763310). Do you know it's not there any more?
* You deleted the shortcut (64156479). It was there a year ago. Do you know it's gone now?

Hej!

Här gick nog något fel. Berget heter troligtvis inte Stompunkt.

No answer. I removed the empty node in Norway.

Hej! Tack för ett bra svar och för att du bidrar till OSM!
Ja, hur det ska namnges är lite oklart.

Hej!
Du får gärna svara när du får en fråga i en ändringsuppsättning.
Sen är det bra om beskrivningen är lite tydligare. T.ex. vad och varför något är ändrat.

Inget svar på 3 månader. Eftersom det känns väldigt osannolikt att det är access=no på dessa vägar tar jag bort det.

Varför ska det vara ref och inte name?

Hej!
Varför satte du det som alternativt namn?

Why?

Hello
This changeset added an empty node in Norway. Shall it be removed or will you add information to it?

Thanks for answering!
I assume it is (or was) a ski track. It does not seem like a ski track Idre fjäll maintains right now. I think it is best to leave it as you did now and see if someone else knows.

https://www.längdspår.se/location/idrefjall?lat=61.89937899918192&lng=12.811136275911394&zoom=13.866962367940662

Hello
Is this really a path?
It crosses a marsch with no sign of any path from the aerial photos (which of course could be out of date).
way/1421834993

Jag har lagt till Älvravinerna som jag tror det borde vara. Kolla om du tycker det ser vettigt ut.

Var det tänkt att denna relation skulle inkludera alla tre delar av Älvravinerna?

Thanks for fixing this and for improving the map!

Is the path over the dam gone?

I'm sorry if I'm sounding a bit harsch, that's not my intention. I'm not able to find the source now. I did read a lot of information for upgrades of the power lines/stations but it was some years ago.

I see now that the OSM wiki states that "the system operator's designation should be used".
I don't like that. Thats not the meaning of nominal and in Sweden the regional power network are are classed (or refered to) as 130 kV, or sometimes more specific, 132 kV (or 150 kV in some cases).
I give you a random link as an example: https://www.vattenfalleldistribution.se/var-verksamhet/projekt/samrad/ort/sala-heby/
In this case it was 138 kV since I added that.

To my knowledge nominal is not a class, it's what you "aim for", then you have deviances from the nominal voltage. I've never heard the word used a class before.

To use the class instead of the "aimed for" voltage is odd. There is a reason we add road width in actual meters, not a wrong value set by the class of the way. Can you think of any other values in OSM handeled in that way?

The difference between this substation and many other substation is that for this one it was known what the voltage level was.
What you do may look nicer on a map, but it is changing something right to something wrong and downgrading data. Change the map if you don't like the look, don't make the data false.
Where the voltage level is known, maybe by spending one hour to find out you shall not remove it just because all other are not known. The key is "voltage". You may add another key if you want, if you feel a need to state that the equipment it is around the 130 kV level/group or something like that.

I think you should revert all your edits where you have downgraded the data.

Please don't change things you don't know anything about.
Here is a quote from one of the major electric companys in Sweden :
"Usually, lines at the current voltage level are called 130 kV lines. The line's operating voltage (nominal voltage) is actually slightly higher than this value, namely 138 kV. The line's design voltage, i.e. the highest voltage for which the plant is designed, is in this case 145 kV."

I have changed it back to 138 kV.

Hej igen!
Hur var det med dessa vägar? Får man verkligen inte vistas på dom?