Nie wykluczam, że na terenie Stacji Obsługi to właśnie MPK jest zarządcą. Miałem się za to zabrać, więc jutro lub w weekend to zmienię (wraz z numeracją torów)

Hi there, wouldn't it be necessary to connect this railway=ferry route to the nearest track in Ystad? It would allow to show the continuity of the route.

Maybe another route, only as railway related?

Well, nigdzie nie było dyskutowane, żeby nagle zmieniać nazwy peronów na nazwy stacji. Ja bym wycofał.

Jeśli użytkownik robi takie zmiany, wpierw należy to przedyskutować na forum - nie robić tego ad hoc

W JOSM masz wtyczkę Urban Eye, tam masz od razu podgląd na to, jak będzie renderował się budynek. Polecam :)

Hej, jeśli mapujesz pod render 3D, to cały budynek musi być "pokryty" building:part

Similar things were happening in Poland, with the same user. You will have to revert it yourself if you hadn't done it yet

Niestety nie wiem, nie ja nanosiłem. Pewnie sytuacja podobna jak przy Niciarnianej-Widzewie

Przy większych edycjach polecam skorzystać z JOSMa wraz z szablonami (osm.wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland#Przydatne_style_rysowania_i_szablony_(JOSM)). Nie trzeba będzie wszystkiego ręcznie wprowadzać xd

Hej, część bramek trakcyjnych jest zdublowana (np. way/459234955). Przydałoby się je usunąć albo zintegrować

Fajnie, dzięki.

P.S. Dodam, że w przypadku Rybnika Towarowego jest posterunek zdalnie sterowany "Rybnik Towarowy PZS RTB11" (Stary posterunek odgałęźny: https://www.atlaskolejowy.net/pl/slaskie/?id=baza&poz=4576)

Hej, przejrzyj użyte sygnały. W kilku znalazłem PL-PKP:s15 xd

Gdy były roboty remontowe na LK95, to wtedy celowo skasowałem. Aczkolwiek to był stan na 2 lata wstecz.

Być może obecnie już jest, trzeba by było sprawdzić

Ah yes, I should be "supporting". I will have that adjusted in a minute

As far as I know, your tagging scheme wasn’t accepted and described as better by anyone in public discussion or forum, so your system cannot be descibed as better. And it seems you did not communicate with others about your scheme, so my argument stands. No link to forum or public discussion about your scheme was presented here.

Well, you may not believe it, but I often look at ORM map and make edits in different places when I notice something - you can see it in my history of edits and notes. As you state your hypothesis, you must present some proof - without that, saying I was asked to join the discussion and „attack” you is a defamation. Still you haven’t given the proof of alleged warning of „joining the majority”

I gave you the documented instruction/standard, how to properly develop a tagging scheme for country-specific tagging and gave you the examples of systems being still in use and widely accepted. Despite differences in railway regulations, those systems have been successfully transcripted into ORM scheme. That should have been considered a guideline of how it should be done and adapted to CZ (this is a country code, not a language code) case. Ignoring wiki pages makes your situation worse. I have been making railway signalling edits for over 2 years and in that time I read neighbouring country regulations, so stop undermining my knowlegde of those documents

I will have your edits reported to moderation as you show no cooperation, erasing without discussion other people’s work without any basis or source and insinuated planned, personal attack on you. @vrabcak, @detective-fiasco are you willing to inform about this situation on CZ forum and moderation?

Um, maybe you have forgotten, but some people have a job and are working in the middle of the day, thus are unable to comment at every minute.

Back to the topic - as an experienced editor of railway-related stuff and one of the implementors and contributors to the tagging schemes and ORM project, I clearly see that your proposed scheme is invalid with the standard of railway=signal. It's weird that you didn't read it and still decided to force-push your proposal - did you even read how other country-specific tagging looks like? It seems not - PL, DE, AT, CZ and SK is very similar in the railway signal structure (The AT has descriptive, non-standardized in codes signalling, the same as CZ). You would have also known that according to D1 regulation, the class/group name of semaphores (entry/exit/intermediate) is hlavni navestidlo (not the ref) (AT uses AT-V2:hauptsignal for example, which literally stands for "main signal") - this is just an example of your invalid tagging scheme. Your "correction" in that case can be considered a vandalism, since you forced your scheme without any public discussion - unless you provide a link to discussion on forum

When it comes to "personal attacks" and "false accusations" - dude, you have assumed that I was asked by detective-fiasco to attack you XD Wow, what a hypocrisy - also speaking about lack of cooperation, while force-pushing. I, on my own, have noticed non-rendered signals in ORM (Lichkov to be exact), inspected and commented your edit.

Saying I must comment in Czech, because a document is in Czech... senseless XD. FYI I read full PL, DE, AT, SK and CZ regulations regarding the signalling. It's sad you haven't touched the railway=signal wiki page...

I'm going to paste that comment there as well

Your "correct" tagging is invalid with given railway=signal scheme (railway=signal#How_Signal_Tagging_works_by_principle). Look up for eg. DE, PL and AT tagging schemes, to know how to properly develop it.

Plus your edits remove more detailed tagging and is not consistent with D1 regulation of SZDC (I have one in front of me) - the names of semaphores, signals and other things is invalid.

What's not serious is the fact, that you didn't discuss this with other users (eg. detective-fiasco), pushing your tagging scheme. Plus, where is your source? Where is the approval of this mass edit?

Not responding to comments will worsen the situation, I'm certain

Your "correct" tagging is invalid with given railway=signal scheme (railway=signal#How_Signal_Tagging_works_by_principle). Look up for eg. DE, PL and AT tagging schemes, to know how to properly develop it.

Plus your edits remove more detailed tagging and is not consistent with D1 regulation of SZDC (I have one in front of me) - the names of semaphores, signals and other things is invalid.

What's not serious is the fact, that you didn't discuss this with other users (eg. detective-fiasco), pushing your tagging scheme. Plus, where is your source? Where is the approval of this mass edit?

Not responding to comments will worsen the situation, I'm certain

power=catenary_portal to są dokładnie bramki i półbramki, na których to kotwiona jest sieć trakcyjna:

https://www.transportszynowy.pl/kolej/siectrakckolkonstrukcje

Na bramownicy montuje się na kolei semafory i tarcze lub inne rzeczy.

W wolnej chwili mogę na wiki napisać o tym artykuł

Poprawiłem link do wiki

Co do nazwy, to case jest ten sam, co dla stacji w Polsce, które mają po kilkanaście nazw, z czego tylko ta po polsku jest oficjalna. Jak chcesz, to wiesz, możesz usunąć xd

Reszta wiki jest podlinkowana poprawnie, sprawdziłem

Obwiednia jest zrobiona poprawnie (jeśli miałeś dane z GDOŚ, to kontur też powinien być ok).

Jedna uwaga: w nazwie występuje dywiz, nie półpauza. Powinno być "Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu Lasy Przysusko-Szydłowieckie" - bo to są lasy i przysuskie, i szydłowieckie (tak jak czarno-biały jest jednocześnie czarny i biały)