Allison P's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128968779 | Not all presets need to have all fields filled. As there is no "no horses" sign on way/1113526273, there should be no horse=* tag at all. |
|
| 129003639 | When drawing features with right-angle corners, like buildings and most swimming pools (e.g., way/1113751994) make sure to press Q to square them. |
|
| 128954019 | Welcome to OSM! A few things from this changeset: Don't use names as descriptions, like on way/929534812 and way/1113411405. Not all features need to be tagged with a name. Some of the features were duplicated, such as the Wendy's and ICCU mapped as nodes under construction. Make sure a feature isn't already represented in some way before adding it. A lot of presets add tags indicating that an area is a building. For way/1080134565, this is incorrect. The entire lot on which the restaurant is located has been marked as a building. For features like that, the building itself should be tagged with the restaurant information. Hope this helps! I've made a few of the more advanced corrections myself. |
|
| 128864259 | Generally, addr:unit should just be the number itself and not the unit type (Suite). |
|
| 101995996 | way/772834576 is semidetached, not detached |
|
| 128720545 | The section beyond the gate is not part of the public road, so the name should probably be removed. |
|
| 128407706 | Please expand road suffixes. They are easy for data consumers to shorten but difficult to expand. Thank you for adding these new subdivisions! |
|
| 118270135 | Some of these were demolished, like way/1038700453 |
|
| 51523937 | Sure, try Heavener. But this bulk edit also adds speed limits to crappy TIGER roads, like private driveways, forest tracks, and even just nonsense. Based on that I can't imagine the real roads' speed limit will be much better. |
|
| 51523937 | Am I really meant to believe that random suburban roads in the middle of towns have an unposted speed limit of 45? Not something lower imposed by the town? |
|
| 97000850 | Guess I missed West Avenue East (should be West Avenue E). Working on those now. |
|
| 128035436 | It is. You will see similar changeset comments from dozens of other Lyft editors. Would be nice if they tweaked the terminology, though. |
|
| 128035436 | "Proprietary" for Lyft meaning "provided to us for use in OSM but not the general public". |
|
| 117140453 | Do you know if the public bookcase is a particular brand? I am looking into getting all LFL bookcases in Ada County on OSM. Their map doesn't list a bookcase here, so I'm wondering if it's a brand I've never heard of or something independent. It's also possible the bookcase was taken down. Do you have any info? Thanks. |
|
| 127754986 | This is factually incorrect. Looking at the Greenville county assessor map this is not a legal road, just a service road. |
|
| 25200274 | Looks more like roads that were planned for subdivisions that never got platted |
|
| 127817508 | You have not responded to my previous changeset comments, which can result in being temporarily blocked from editing. Please use better changeset comments. |
|
| 127439688 | There is no island anymore. It was demolished about a year ago. Why did you readd? |
|
| 125755130 | units=88 on way/1091717204 is not a recognized tag. It is better to tag the number of units in each building with building:flats=*. |
|
| 127162220 | The building doesn't exist. It's another one of zluuzki's (fka Hiausirg) unapproved imports. It is visible on no aerial photos and despite not having a source tag, is from microsoft/buildingFootprints. VLD190 (and Facebook as a whole), you need to conduct sanity checks when you make these "fixes". What you did might suppress the error as reported by Atlas, but it does nothing to improve the underlying data quality, and in a sense actually worsens it because the error becomes more difficult to spot. This is not the first low-quality edit of this type I've seen. |