Đuro Jiří, thank you for the fix!
And thank you for doing changes in the small boundaries!

@maro21, thanks!

This "building" looks too huge: way/1268150052 and it would be better to split it into real buildings :)

I've added a comment to https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/907

Also maybe it make sense to ask to reopen https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/871 or create a new issue.

Thank you for your answers!

"Why the object was removed - it's pretty obvious" — I do not agree, for me it is not obvious.

This ^^^ is a good comment for the change:

> supermarket is located one building away, and it was already mapped accordingly. Also, the original building is too small to host anything called 'supermarket', it looks like a residential building.

Maybe it is better to change tag to "shop=vacant" instead of removing? In case of removing, we lost whole history of the place.

Also please write better changeset description — why it was removed by you? Please read osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

By some reason, your change was from "good" to "bad: way/414453283/history/4 → way/414453283/history/5

Just FYI: I've changed "smoothness=bad" to "smoothness=good" because at least the upper part of the road wasn't bad.

I also split the road into two parts so if lower part has different smoothness maybe someone will update it:

way/414453283
way/1520590257

Yes, please add 'seasonal' tag. Maybe also you can add something like 'check_date=2025-08' if you saw it, for example, last august.

Sorry, Matija Nalis, which address and building have you added in this changeset?
I was near the place today and there is nothing, just sea.

One more to check: note/5286964

To check: note/5286940

@maro21, why did you remove tag indoor_seating=yes from node/1368372245 ?

1. Not every fast_food place has indoor seating.

2. Even if this is 100% clear for you, it may be not clear for others, also for bots/scripts. Please don't remove data which looks obvious for you.

3. When you're removing any data I added, could you please notify me about it?

1. @maro21, why did you remove tag access=yes from way/187847931 ?

2. When you're removing any data I added, could you please notify me about it? OSM is shitty about watching, in comparison for example with MediaWiki websites. I don't know a tool how to watch for such destructive changes of my locally collected data.

The change finally finished conversation in changeset/164651727

And… finally fixed!
changeset/175774384

Marek,

Why I've asked about the rule from community, which forbids this ^^^ changes:

If there is a change to the OSM, which reverts something, which is not forbidden, and removes information about smoothness, removes check_date tags, removes objects which are exist in the real world but were absent in OSM, adds object which is absent in the real world, adds wrong information about pedestrian access (maybe it is even dangerous for people's health) — is it okay to call such a change "vandalism"?

Marek, could you please share a link to "the local community's decision" which **forbids** me to draw 2 roads with different surface as 2 ways?

Just a note for myself: I see you're okay with reverting someone's huge job osm.wiki/?diff=2821415 without even say "sorry" osm.wiki/User_talk:Mateusz_Konieczny/Archive_2#Why_did_you_remove_my_translation,_which_I_worked_on_for_a_week?

+ one more long thread to read (for me): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-separated-footways-or-cycleways-along-central-street-as-one-tagged-line-versus-mutiple-lines/126766