I agree that I have been misinterpreting the situation on-ground somewhat, even if I didn't see any activity when I surveyed the area.

If it's operated by the company it represents.

The official Facebook page for the airport reported that it has indeed shutdown, what form of activity do you believe is still present here?

Thank you for pointing this out, I've restored the way as a building:part. changeset/181479173

Reverts changeset/180412173 and changeset/180412154. "source:population" were retagged with "Google" for both nodes which is enough to warrant an immediate reversion of these changes.

Hello, I've reverted this and another related changeset as these use Google as their source, which is not allowed on OpenStreetMap. Please see osm.wiki/Google on why exactly that is the case.

Is the road actually closed or has it been removed? The latter is implied as you've deleted the way.

Also, based on your username, you may have a connection with the school. Please read https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines if that's the case.

Thank you, I've adjusted the tags based on the information given. changeset/180480283

way/87448531 Could you elaborate on what's here other than "tarmac where a lovely lawn once stood"? Is a bus station actually located here or something else? Also, please refrain from using name=* for descriptions, and especially not to vent your frustrations.

Please keep your changesets small, you've changed three nodes across three countries.

It's been 10 days since the importer was blocked and I believe they've yet to give any sort of license. I've gone ahead and reverted all changes that imported this data, and any that modified it afterwards. changeset/179602437

I've gone ahead and reverted these changes for you. changeset/179436479

I know this comment is from 7 years ago, but the Chinese text just seems to be its English name translated. I've gone ahead and split the name tag into separate name:en and name:zh entries.

Please try to keep your changeset bboxes as small as possible.

Hello, the section of the highway you just renamed to "Morledge" is referred to as the Cock Pitt by on-site signage, and thus was previously accurate. Are you sure your changes are accurate?

Hello, may I ask what "cad data" means as a source? Your geometry tweaks are very off from what is shown on aerial imagery (see the area around the Eagle Centre Substation and Osmaston Road).

Hello, I've reverted your edits because they appear to be low-quality, which seems to be a common pattern among a majority of your changesets. One example is that a wall adjacent to the Swansea City Bus Station was randomly connected to the left lane of West Way. Please thorough review your changes before publishing them.

changeset/179055250

Oops, completely forgot about the edits I made in Hamilton. My bad.

What is this node supposed to represent?

I noticed that you added "(closed for construction)" to the name key of node/9315056822. Is this mentioned construction temporary? If so, it should not be included on OpenStreetMap. Regardless, "name" should not be used for descriptions, please use the description key for that. Though, you can use other tags to indicate long-term construction works.