Thank you for the apology. I had edited the area, but did not really say so. So apology accepted and an apology from me for lack of clear response re acceptance of your advice.

I wonder, as some arable land is increasingly being rotated with animals, usually pigs, how this would be tagged? (It may be better for land cleanliness and fertility.) Might not apply in Wales, but farmland could be generically correct in that it would be 'cropland' and meadow. I'm sure we'd not want to be changing tags every 2 or 3 years depending on current use.

There's no need to be so patronising. The wiki does state that many mappers have a preference for farmland to mean cropland. Fair enough. So I'm not mistaken, I just used a value that could be refined to be more specific. I'd actually taken that on board, but clearly you felt you needed to double down on telling me I was wrong. Cheers for that.

Hi kitsee. It's certainly farmland, but meadow would be a refinement. You may well be seeing sheep, but all the on the ground evidence is bovine. Literally!

The tethered mast visible in some imagery has since been removed in the year since I mapped it so now deleted.

Hi. I don't know why you changed the building for Your World Financial Services into a commercial landuse. Landuse should have been a separate feature covering the buildings.

You refer to the Helsinki model. What is that for OpenStreetMap? I can't find any reference to it in the OSM Wiki.

Hi, is this a duplicate of the existing AED on the south corner wall of the Phoenix. If so, I'll recheck to see if an AED is again inside.

Hi. No problem with the change. I was using the Every Door app and did not notice the odd tag use.

Hi,

Mistake now corrected. How did you catch it?

I've able to log on to TM on pc, but not phone.

way/1235220487/history

Hi @Firefishy,
We've been doing some HOT mapping in this area and I've come across this razed railway route.
It looks to me that this should now be highway=unclassified as other highways connect to it. I'm not sure how to treat the railway aspect - was:railway=razed? Also would this damage the relation record?
Adrian

Hi @mueschel. Yes, now corrected, thank you.

Adrian

I am going to deleted this feature as there is no physical evidence in any imagery> The tags do not make sense either.

Hi DominikFehervary

I don't understand why you have mapped this rectangle highway=river. way/1453542678#map=18/7.050723/9.476636 Highways are for roads, a river is a waterway. However, what is this rectangle representing with the name of fi? It's a ditch in a tidal river according to your tags. I see you have only made two edits, so I assume this was a mistaken test?

Adrian

Thank you Frans.

Hi Frans. I suspect I would have picked that up in my OSMI/OSMose QA checks. Did you make the change to unclassified? Are you advising that I should do so for this or just in future?

Hi WT Hundu. While mapping some waterways, I noticed very small residential areas in a larger residential area here way/1389490341/history#map=19/7.342733/9.705768 This is not usually correct.
Then I noticed that they appear to have the names of people living there. This does not follow the rules of OpenStreetMap, described here. osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information. The small residential area should probably be removed. However they could be replaced with individual rectangular or round buildings with building=yes, but no personal information. If you personally know they are houses, then use building=house. If you have any questions, just reply to this comment.
Regards,
Adrian

Hi jajanja3,
Great work mapping the drives and gardens around Istead Rise. The changeset description mentions houses. I wondered what you did? I thought I'd mapped them well.
Also, I think the footways along the roads should also be tagged footway=sidewalk, see osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
Adrian

The line has service=siding, but a rail way can't cross like that.

Hi @tadcan You appear to have modified a bit of rail way that may duplicate and crosses an existing line. I can't see a second line (one is a bit of a challenge!) here in the recent DRC imagery. Do you think the second piece should be deleted?
Adrian

You also have what appears to be a duplicate highway going south west from Buyamaba. You mapped it first in 2021, and again this month.