ça serait pratique préciser la région ou le pays concerné dans le résumé.

Also, ground survey didn't find this.

@Sebasawk: even if it was reverted, can we get the reasoning behind this change? I noticed a series of similar changesets. None seem to explain why. I'd think of driveways as access roads, but maybe you read a difference in the definition, please explain.

If you stopped working on this, can you ask somebody else from your employer, TomTom, to follow-up on this question?

changeset/184939261

voir changeset/184476050

voir changeset/184476050

Noted. Thanks.

Actually, I didn't. I looked at their aerial imagery, just to notice that the resolution seems to be 20th century-like.

The address nodes were already present on the Map, but placed outside the structure. So I moved them into it, leaving it to the local mapper to improve it further.

amenity=doctors is generally used for physicians. Robin Gervais is not licensed to practice in Switzerland.

Maybe addr:housenumber=* ?

Interestingly, these are already present, but with different values. Sample:

way/1531647846 has 61

node/12273172169 has 31

Indirectly, the URLs provide a reference for the entire feature, not just its names. This is not inconsistent with our key definition at url=* . Providing a reference is not the same as sourcing and generally implies multiple resources. If you are worried about long-term retrieval, there is the Internet Archive.

Is there a single resource you have in mind from which you had wanted to source and create this? Sorry if I got ahead of you.

Which part of the definition are you referring to? The picture illustrating the article might even look like the manor on that property.

The value for the key addr:country=* would generally be osm.wiki/Tag%3Aaddr%3Acountry%3DCO

The value for addr:country=* would generally be addr:country=IT

What's the reasoning behind the removal of service=driveway from these access roads?

I created it directly at node/13961838365

I added the URLs to provide verifyability for how this exclave is named.

There is no official website and the region is not present in swissNAMES3D, so I used several relevant pages that document those naming variants, including different names across Buchberg's website. They provide long-term, checkable references.

relation/1687206 was created by another mapper.

I'm open to adjusting the tagging approach to better match OSM guidance for storing multiple references.

Pour ce type de modification récurrente, serait-ce possible d'ajouter au résumé le/les pays concernés (la France, j'imagine) ?

Ou de limiter l'étendue géographique des changeset ?

Yes, that helps, thanks. On a separate node (POI) for you, that URL could be in url=* .

To indicate that its within the centre, maybe
addr:unit=* = Aliotis
addr:floor=* = 2
would do.

This should provide a minium level of verifiability and could work for similar POIs.

BTW, in my view, you could include your personal name in name=* . There is also contact:facebook=* contact:instagram=* contact:linkedin=* . Personally, I'd avoid including an email, but it's up to you.

Notice: This comment may be spell-checked and proofread with various tools. It does reflect the views of myself or those mentioned.

node/13285536907 is the same as node/12124115850