ברוכים הבאים ותודה על תרומתך!
אתה הוספת כאן שם לפינה של הבניין הבת כנסת. האם רצית להוסיף פרטים לבת כנסת עצמו או לייצר אישות חדשה?

Hi, regarding your question, there is a comfortable app to collect street view images - Mapillary. In general it mostly used to collect tracks, but it also has a nice feature of taking single image. If you'll use it to catch new places - other mappers will also be able to use these photos for their mapping. This provider is fully approved for OSM usage and nicely integrated in many popular editors.

app link is: https://www.mapillary.com/app

Here is my personal example where I took a picture of bomb shelter to later map it: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1027066689507715

there are more similar platforms https://kartaview.org/map and https://mapilio.com/app but only Mapillary allows single-picture mode.

BTW, great detalization, may I ask what is the source you used to map them?

Welcome and thanks for your contribution!

I noticed that you moved some roads to match aerial photos on bing. I'd like to ensure that you firstly aligned images to GPS tracks since they are always misaligned and all shifted several meters in random directios.

If not, please be sure to read instructions here: osm.wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

Also, will not harm to read our local guide: osm.wiki/Israel

and if you need any help - feel free to ask community (all links in wiki page above)

agree, thanks

I'd highly recommend to use osm.wiki/Israel page as your starting guide. If you have any questions - feel free to ask local or global community in forums or telegram groups (links are in wiki page)

Welcome and thank you for your contribution!

May I ask you why you deleted name:he?

also, there is no big benefit of mapping things under construction, they are easier to be mapped when actually opened, can be recorder with gps and have official names. if you eager to map something - there are plenty of details you can add.

I'd recommend you to stop mapping using Sentinel Explorer and come to osm community forum to ask clarification from other mappers
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

I don't see them on Esri World Imagery included in iD editor. Most external sources are copyrighted and better not be used until you explicitly saw them approved in osm wiki.

Hi, if you are transportation planner and if you do know some local official rules (and if not), you are welcome to join relevant roads categorization discussion on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/130247

Ok, did you tried to contact the user who mapped this originally?
Why delete instead of fixing?
For example, looks like many of buildings are actually roofs on columns, so instead of deleting them you could just fix the tagging with building:part=column, no? (building:part=column)

BTW, this place's official website actually uses OSM map for presenting 3D model of the site, I guess original author explicitly mapped this for their site.
see yourself at the very bottom of this page: https://www.kfarhanokdim.co.il/

Hi, can you, please, elaborate more about this edit and why soo many deletions?

hi again,
you separated segregated foot+cycle path here. This is also correct but in most cases not necessary if on the ground there is no big physical separation between them (like trees, or grass island).
Up to you.

and, hopefully last, you changed way/37558506 from primary_link to residential, this is not correct and there are strict rules regarding road types. see highway=*#Link_roads and, please, change back.

anyway, I did small fixes here, converted both sideway and cycleway to be on the bridge and added several missing traffic lights on all crosses. please validate that all is good now.

btw, looks like you accidentally connected cycleway to the 5th road passing under the bridge, I think this is not the case as a new cycleway is just a right lane of Moshe Sneh and passes over the bridge.
ping me if you need help with fixing this.

hi, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

when you tag:
access=no
bicycle=yes
highway=cycleway

I think both access and bicycle tags are already assumed because of highway=cycleway so you can omit them next time.

there is mention of Sentinel-2:
osm.wiki/Sentinel-2
but only using their tiles and not Sentinel Explorer

Hi, I can't find this Sentinel Explorer as approved source. Do you?
If not, I'm afraid you'll need to either remove these mappings or record them yourself using GPX

osm.wiki/Available_Data
osm.wiki/Potential_datasources