yrtimiD's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114913170 | This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478 |
|
| 114913152 | This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478 |
|
| 114912897 | This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478 |
|
| 114912888 | This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478 |
|
| 167200795 | did this extraction in changeset/167540449 will appreciate if such future big removals will be discussed with the local community ahead |
|
| 167200795 | Hi, allow me to not agree with this (major) change. Currently (mapped) vast majority of the city is residential, and there are only few small industrial or commercial areas, so there is no big overlap. Instead of dropping residential completely, it's better to add all "different" kinds of landuse as a holes in the residential relation eliminating any overlap. (of course this will require duplicating current relation and moving landuse=residential to it) |
|
| 167168907 | welcome to osm and thank you for contribution! you deleted here natural=spring and description tags. what was incorrect with them? |
|
| 167314849 | BTW, if using aerial imagery don't forget to align them to existing GPX tracks. looks like your new roundabout and freshly moved "Alfasi" roads south to it should be shifted to the right |
|
| 167314849 | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution! Asked for review? Here you go: way/1393055764:
rest - all good!
|
|
| 167169634 | same question for way/1370082427 area with node/12688373900 node |
|
| 167169634 | hi, you deleted here this area way/1370082426/history/1, maybe it's not really an abandoned village, but on satellite images it looks like at least ruins. maybe we should preserve it with different tags? |
|
| 146701874 | hi, does it make sense to have a constant maxheight for a big road chunk?
|
|
| 167121010 | Hi, can you, please, avoid using non-standard tags like hashtags? The "source:addr" would be more appropriate here |
|
| 167025799 | hi and welcome!
|
|
| 167066343 | Hi and welcome!
to be:
and can remove check_date tag (or update it to today's date) |
|
| 166582543 | Hi and welcome to OSM!
|
|
| 166376367 | Hi, you added here roundabout (way/1387430145) which I can't find on any available satellite imagery. Can you, please, confirm your sources and that this was not mistake? |
|
| 165919892 | hi, also the 24/6 is not standard format for hours (in node/12816126410) I'm afraid you'll need to do something like "Mo-Su: 00:00-24:00; Sa: off" |
|
| 165910762 | Hi, you also added strange round building way/1384151277 I'd like to know what kind of building is this? I don't see anything similar on street view maps. |
|
| 165905919 | I understand, but Tashoot is definitely originated from Hebrew...
|