Not sure what you mean there. Both of those stand alone and share no path with any other ways as far as I see. Which ways do you think duplicate them?

You seem to be creating relations that are missing their outer ways. I've fixed up dozens of them lately. Any idea what's causing that?

Thanks for fixing this before I spotted what I'd broken! :-)

Yes, identical coordinates, as reported on OSMInspector. 1 metre threshold, I think.

The main reason was the numerous duplicate points in the way. The easiest way to remove those was a simple Douglas-Peucker reduction.

Fixed - thanks

Ah, yes, that's more appropriate. Thanks for improving that.

It was marked proposed:highway=no, so I removed on that basis. Feel free to resurrect it if that was wrong!

Fixed that, and a few others I found in the area. Thanks for the correction.

Looks like the track was added 3 years later, and not routed through the gate. I'll move the gate onto the track where it belongs. Thanks for the prod!

That's not an area, just an address way, for houses that all share the same postcode: osm.wiki/Addresses

The car-park is just the large layby near the phone box (which no longer has a phone in, I noticed last week): node/266854132

Thank you - it looks much closer to the ground-truth now. BTW, is there a web page with instructions for a resurrection like this (in case I ever need to do the same thing myself)?

The paths were all constructed since the felling; the available aerial photos are all quite old. They were definitely still present last week when I was there.

Please revert the part of this change that removed paths in Kirkton Woods (specifically, those I added in changeset/52577218). There was no good reason to delete them.

I haven't been that way for a long time, but I think it might be permanently closed (to prevent traffic using it as a cut-through). It really needs visiting to confirm the ground truth.

Thanks - it got missed when the Forth Road Bridge re-opened in January 2016. Good catch; now fixed.

Millions of flies eat shit, but pure numbers don't make a good argument: I'll not be changing my diet...

No, these are the names of the operators of those shops. If they are mis-tagged elsewhere, that doesn't mean they should be in Elgin, too.

Done.

Actually, both the relations you've edited here have lost their outer ways - please fix them.