The paths were all constructed since the felling; the available aerial photos are all quite old. They were definitely still present last week when I was there.

Please revert the part of this change that removed paths in Kirkton Woods (specifically, those I added in changeset/52577218). There was no good reason to delete them.

I haven't been that way for a long time, but I think it might be permanently closed (to prevent traffic using it as a cut-through). It really needs visiting to confirm the ground truth.

Thanks - it got missed when the Forth Road Bridge re-opened in January 2016. Good catch; now fixed.

Millions of flies eat shit, but pure numbers don't make a good argument: I'll not be changing my diet...

No, these are the names of the operators of those shops. If they are mis-tagged elsewhere, that doesn't mean they should be in Elgin, too.

Done.

Actually, both the relations you've edited here have lost their outer ways - please fix them.

I surveyed Craibstone to Charleston and Stonehaven last weekend, so expect an update with lanes, limits and lighting in the next day or two (plus refined positioning in parts).

I would guess so, but my survey was a few hours before it actually opened, so I haven't actually driven it yet.

Good catch - thanks for spotting that!

This link *is* open northbound (and the bridge is not yet open to traffic). I surveyed on Sunday and have now fixed this.

This link is definitely open - re-surveyed 2014-10-14

I take it you've actually surveyed these? The overbridge still looked closed when I passed at around 21:30. Also, when updating, please remove any obsolete proposed:* or construction:* that are no longer relevant, and update the speed limits. Thanks.

Thanks. I do keep my photo notes - just needed to find the right ones!

It didn't appear to be a public road, and I don't remember seeing vehicular access from B9124. Perhaps the access is from A9 Falkirk Road via the other "path"? It's certainly possible that I made a mistake, because this was a drive-by survey.

Thanks for that - I've merged those two, and a couple more duplicate bridges that I found. Do comment again if you find any more (or fix them yourself if it's obvious - there's a relation that might be useful: relation/7455658).

This fixes duplication introduced in changeset/51014313 and changeset/49758202

Okay, I've unified them: changeset/62465706

Okay, I've unified these: changeset/62465706