I take it you've actually surveyed these? The overbridge still looked closed when I passed at around 21:30. Also, when updating, please remove any obsolete proposed:* or construction:* that are no longer relevant, and update the speed limits. Thanks.

Thanks. I do keep my photo notes - just needed to find the right ones!

It didn't appear to be a public road, and I don't remember seeing vehicular access from B9124. Perhaps the access is from A9 Falkirk Road via the other "path"? It's certainly possible that I made a mistake, because this was a drive-by survey.

Thanks for that - I've merged those two, and a couple more duplicate bridges that I found. Do comment again if you find any more (or fix them yourself if it's obvious - there's a relation that might be useful: relation/7455658).

This fixes duplication introduced in changeset/51014313 and changeset/49758202

Okay, I've unified them: changeset/62465706

Okay, I've unified these: changeset/62465706

There are two aqueducts: one opened in 1859 and the other in 1901. That extra one (without a start_date) looks like an imposter.

Well, if that's what's going to happen, it needs the tag wiki for 'ref' and any replacement tag to explicitly say when to use the standard tagging and when to use the new tagging - preferably with plenty of time to update editors, renderers and any scripts that group results by road, before such changes take place, surely?

Thanks - now joining the list to find out what's going on and how it can be fixed.

Thanks - now joining the list to find out what's going on and how it can be fixed.

Thanks, SomeoneElse. It sounds like this whole thing is about *rendering*? If there's a move to not rendering refs, then isn't the right thing to change your renderer, rather than corrupting the whole database to fit the rendering? That's totally against the "don't tag for the renderer" principle.

I *think* I've subscribed, but haven't received any messages yet. I'd really like to find out what caused all this damage...

I've now subscribed to talk-gb, but won't be able to read until next week (I don't have email access here, only Web).

I surveyed on Sunday evening (when it definitely was 1 lane and 40 mph) - it was supposed to open fully today, but I'm not in a position to resurvey (about 150 miles away, sorry).

Are you using a script for this vandalism? Please reverse it so that it restores the standard and documented tags. Thanks.

Where did the 15 km/h limit at Roman Camp come from?

This was still signed as closed when I passed last weekend - is it really open to all vehicles? If not, then it might need motor_vehicle=no.

Makes sense - the carriageways are from an average of a few dozen traces, so they can be regarded as exact. I'll update them if I'm not beaten to it!

Yes, and the linking section is on its way to being surfaced.