tms13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 17688175 | Looks like the track was added 3 years later, and not routed through the gate. I'll move the gate onto the track where it belongs. Thanks for the prod! |
|
| 108125504 | That's not an area, just an address way, for houses that all share the same postcode: osm.wiki/Addresses The car-park is just the large layby near the phone box (which no longer has a phone in, I noticed last week): node/266854132 |
|
| 89107212 | Thank you - it looks much closer to the ground-truth now. BTW, is there a web page with instructions for a resurrection like this (in case I ever need to do the same thing myself)? |
|
| 89107212 | The paths were all constructed since the felling; the available aerial photos are all quite old. They were definitely still present last week when I was there. |
|
| 89107212 | Please revert the part of this change that removed paths in Kirkton Woods (specifically, those I added in changeset/52577218). There was no good reason to delete them. |
|
| 3896479 | I haven't been that way for a long time, but I think it might be permanently closed (to prevent traffic using it as a cut-through). It really needs visiting to confirm the ground truth. |
|
| 55997342 | Thanks - it got missed when the Forth Road Bridge re-opened in January 2016. Good catch; now fixed. |
|
| 67631596 | Millions of flies eat shit, but pure numbers don't make a good argument: I'll not be changing my diet... |
|
| 67631596 | No, these are the names of the operators of those shops. If they are mis-tagged elsewhere, that doesn't mean they should be in Elgin, too. |
|
| 65405958 | Done. |
|
| 27691006 | Actually, both the relations you've edited here have lost their outer ways - please fix them. |
|
| 65405958 | I surveyed Craibstone to Charleston and Stonehaven last weekend, so expect an update with lanes, limits and lighting in the next day or two (plus refined positioning in parts). |
|
| 65405958 | I would guess so, but my survey was a few hours before it actually opened, so I haven't actually driven it yet. |
|
| 35797161 | Good catch - thanks for spotting that! |
|
| 63319716 | This link *is* open northbound (and the bridge is not yet open to traffic). I surveyed on Sunday and have now fixed this. |
|
| 63319716 | This link is definitely open - re-surveyed 2014-10-14 |
|
| 63291611 | I take it you've actually surveyed these? The overbridge still looked closed when I passed at around 21:30. Also, when updating, please remove any obsolete proposed:* or construction:* that are no longer relevant, and update the speed limits. Thanks. |
|
| 31852502 | Thanks. I do keep my photo notes - just needed to find the right ones! |
|
| 60663366 | It didn't appear to be a public road, and I don't remember seeing vehicular access from B9124. Perhaps the access is from A9 Falkirk Road via the other "path"? It's certainly possible that I made a mistake, because this was a drive-by survey. |
|
| 51014313 | Thanks for that - I've merged those two, and a couple more duplicate bridges that I found. Do comment again if you find any more (or fix them yourself if it's obvious - there's a relation that might be useful: relation/7455658). |