Hi Carol - You might want to check the phone number as it has too many digits. In the international format the leading zero on mobile numbers is also omitted.

Having the site as a landuse area is an issue as in reality for most of the time the area is a carpark. Having individual stalls as nodes is a lot better as they can also get different tags for the type of 'crafts' or goods sold. craft=*

PS I am also a local Tasmanian. I will send you a personal email re some tags.

I have updated your listing to a node (tourist attraction) and also added the opening hours. It would not be appropriate to have a landuse listing for a place that only operates one day a week

Ooops - hopefully its fixed now

Hi Wombat - try to remember to "square' buildings after drawing around them. After assigning the building tag press the Q key on your keyboard or click on the message in ID editor. Happy mapping!

Hi Clarkington - best practice is not to join land use to roadways. In this instance it should be drawn at the fencelines to the paddocks, not the road.

Very few grapes in the midlands - these are cherry orchards (Jericho).

The correct tagging for a cliff is natural=cliff (not cliffs). I have updated all your recent edits

Are the "kierans spot's" actual attractions? Seems to me that this changeset has some issues. Certainly the names are more descriptions than proper names.

Its also best practice to add useful changeset comments rather than just single words - osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Good edit but remember to 'square' the buildings using the Q key of your keyboard.

Why was the land that is actually farming deleted in this changeset? https://osmcha.org/changesets/133595088?aoi=c18a05d1-bdfc-4d43-add3-dda59c918220

You do realise that lots of this "natural=wood" is actually commercial forestry (landuse=forest)? You also appeared to have deleied out some of the farmed areas and included them with the natural=wood despite the fact they are paddocks.

I would be really beneficial if you could update your mapping technique to use relations and not have overlapping features in golf courses. leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Why have these cart paths been deleted and replaced by 'rough'? This looks to be tagging for the renderer? It would also be good if you didnt digitise bunkers with 'rough' through the middle. They can have common boundaries.

Please add better changeset comments - this would have been much more informative with "Edited Cape Wickham Golf Course"

Please use more detailed change set comments. Every single one of your change sets has the same comment regardless of what you have digitised. This chnageset would have been much more informative with "Added Currie Post Office"

Hi Folks - quick tip for you - there is no need to add both a point and an area for a golf tee. Most folks just use an area. Also folks seldom add the pin as it moves around all the time and almost no-one keeps them up to date in the actual locations on courses.

Cheers - Phil

Hi Folks - what is going on here - looks like the building has changed to just nodes?

Hi Folks - I have just started cleaning up some of your golf features. A few common issues - you dont really need a golf tee point as well as a tee box, tee boxes can also have the colours , there should be no flag poles at the pin, you dont need all the relations at each hole (only where the green is within the fairway). Have a good read of the golf wiki for common errors. leisure=golf_course

Cheers - Phil