a community centre has a specific meaning in OSM. I suppose that you wanted to put a place node at the centre of a village to have its name, right?

your building tracing in this area severely lacks precision. Would you mind re-visiting this area and orthogonalizing the building outlines as well as adjusting them to the real houses position?

what are these "wilderness_huts" you added? the definition is quite clear and the few samples I checked have no indication of any man-made structure near the locations where you added nodes.

we should discuss this in the forum. Please bring up your arguments https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19316

you missed some road classifications when you upgraded roads. I trust you re-assesment of classifications, so for example changed the missing piece way/262736966 also to tertiary. Check Osmose for highway continuity to find more.

Please don't blindly re-classify sections of roads into tertiary

way/665184558 is certainly no tertiary. I changed that. Probably it came from a bad Kaart edit nearby. What is that undocumented "hwpi" tag you are adding?

please do not re-tag residential roads as tertiary. way/665184555

way/687550096 is tagged as unspecific "road" type. It looks like a track. If you are uncertain what it is, better not map at all. I changed to track based on aerial.

way/687549501 is at most an agricultural track, not a primary highway. I repaired it for you. In the future, please pay more attention to your tagging.

Hello, you classified way/678210128 as a secondary highway, even it is much closer to an agriculture track. I fixed that for you. Please be more careful when mapping in the future. Also your buildings lack on the geometry precision. Please use the tools of the editor to draw orthogonal buildings. It would be great if you could revisit this area and fix your edits.

Dear Kaart, please only change the classification of highways in case you have a good source. For a tertiary we usually expect a highway reference like a four digit classification. Reverting the change. way/238460834

please do not use OSM for testing purposes. way/858964360 is no tertiary highway.

why are you re-tagging a residential into living_street? You had been part of the thread in which we decided, that due to the missing legal concept of living_streets in Thailand we are not using this. speed limits are always tagged when signed, access tags describe it in case the road is not open to the general public. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19316

you are re-tagging unpaved tracks into tertiary roads. Why? way/794576719 You also re-tagged surrounding roads. Your change-set comment is not helpful. Please give other mappers more hints about why you are doing such drastic changes and what source it is based on.

you removed all tagging on way/552240191. Why? Tagging as lake looks reasonable...

do not add invented features. reverting 552240187

are you trying to cheat pokemon? way/764548751 covers houses and more. it is not a park. Similar way/764548752 which is the bus terminal. Please do not game with OSM, otherwise we will get you blocked.

I personally would not map individual patches of farmland. I think this level of detail is a bit excessive at the current time. way/854082331 is on maxar imagery not a water feature but looks like a dried out pond. So you could add additional tags like pond and maybe some tagging indicating that water is only seasonal. On way/854082335 you added source tags. This is obsolete. Also, as you stated "local knowledge", please add the name of the temple. If you modify a facebook import and confirm it is reasonable, you could remove the import=yes tagging from it.way 854082325 looks more like a weir on aerial, but as you stated local knowledge you might have seen it and can confirm that it is made from rock/soil. way/854082286 has much larger dimensions. Check out maxar. Also water/pond might be a more suitable tagging. In general your tagging looks good.

you added additional tags to geometries not corresponding to the situation on the ground/aerial. For example way/662952977 is not reflecting the shape of the building. How to proceed with these shapes? If you want to keep the building=yes, at least remove the area=yes. I cleaned up other parts, but those had been untagged, where you have added a partially valid tagging here.