May' 19 situation: https://www.google.com/maps/@17.0463448,100.2168566,3a,75y,123.81h,73.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sBHt72AF-pEsoQQdellqaKQ!2e0!5s20140201T000000!7i16384!8i8192

how confident are you that the data source regarding tertiary 4049 is correct? On all aerial sources it still looks like an agricultural track. Also lots of bridges are missing. Could it be that this road is or was some planned extensions which did not (yet) make it? I feel we should only tag existing tertiary roads as such. If it is still planned, please use the construction tag. way/797038705

while whether shelters are technically a sort of building, what purpose does it serve to map them for fighting malaria? Maybe consider tagging them appropriately? example way/690768512
please also make sure you get the geometry right.

please draw building outlines with proper shapes. your editor has a function to do this. please use your editor accordingly. Please re-visit this area and fix your edits, for example way/696327722

please use tags on elements according to their documented meaning. maxspeed documents a signed legal speed limit, not what you consider is appropriate. Also a ford has a very specific meaning. Similar a living_street for which the legal equivalent is not existing in Thailand. The road is a simple residential. way/721808228

way/838864874 is tagged as ford. given the surrounding, this is quite unlikely. Other ways nearby have the same wrong tagging. Also you did not connect the ways to the road network.
We also do not create "areas" to label village. Please use the established and documented tags from the wiki. If you need assistance, please contact experienced mappers, for example in the forum. Please also take care of warnings displayed by your editor. It did warn you about the problems before you submitted.

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

please learn how to use the editor to draw proper shapes. Buildings have right-angled corners, even in Thailand

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

you did overdraw existing shapes. Also your geometries has nothing to do with reality. use editor properly. Reverting this changeset,

you did draw new outlines on top of existing ones. And you not even got the geometry right. Use the editor to have right-angled corners on the buildings. reverting this changeset.

please do not draw new ways on top of already existing ones

there is no highway=secondary there. Stop inventing these things

do not map imaginary POIs for whatever reason. There is no guest_house

do not invent tertiary highways in the middle of fields

these are no buildings. Stop mapping imaginary houses

please be more careful what you map and what tag you are using. The geometry of your ways does not follow reality. Tagging as primary highways has nothing to do with reality. Buildings need right-angles in the corners. Use the provided functionality of the editor to draw proper shapes.

your edit is already a bit older. For way/737033495 a tagging as ford is certainly wrong. Please check the wiki for a description of the meaning of the individual tags. Do not rely on the editor. Check out the forum to get in contact with experienced mappers who are happy to assist.