OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
100594287

I've removed the comment in: changeset/100657670

100657670

This changeset is in follow-up to discussion at: changeset/100594287

100594287

I'll defer to you - I only got as far as the wall with the private keep out sign (eastern end - node/7633403455) - and could only see one route continuing into the woods. I thought based on the heading it was the more Northerly of the 2 but may have been wrong.

Incidentally the private keep out sign looked quite new, how long has it been there? If these routes have existed for some time might be worth a DMMO for public footpath to keep public access?

97794287

Hi Paul, did you mean to add this with a public_transport:version=2 tag? Looks to a little sort of between 1 and 2 to me? Its mostly 2 but you've still get the forward/backwards roles which are not valid under V2: osm.wiki/Buses#Adding_streets_to_the_relation

98042200

Sorry I've got this wrong, its signed as "5 Tons". Should it be "5 lt" based on osm.wiki/Map_features/Units#Explicit_specifications? Looks like without a unit maxweight=*?uselang=en Tonnes is the default? Although this whole Ton/Tonnes ect. is rather confusing!

96683275

Source should be Ariel Imagery - not GPS

88160742

No worries, I've left the Common Garden Street stops as you put them, nice spot on them being incorrect. Not at all.

88139375

Hi,
Just to let you know it looks like you have inadvertently deleted most of the bus route tags for these routes - I've fixed these in changeset #88160742 (changeset/88160742)

86563220

(sorry, mean Wray in comment)

83080462

Scrap that ^

83080462

(Mean southbound)

83055789

See note #2147145 (note/2147145)

56769615

Bit late but just confirming, yes the platforms are staggered (as currently mapped), and yes the bridge is still present.

81168356

Rest of route added in changeset/81175550

81024640

Sorry, think I've fixed it. Not sure why that happened.

64489670

Cheers, thanks for pointing that out.

64489670

Don't know what came over-me there, yes your right residential is defiantly inappropriate. I think service looks better though, its only for access to the farm. Service is listed "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc." whereas unclassified is "Public access road, non-residential." and my view is the former fits better but happy to defer if there is something I have missed.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64489670

59568569

Sorry, thank you for the information. Ill ensure I keep a look out, is there a different way this information should be dealt with?

59401119

Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense.

About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again?

52358249

Its seems I have, fixing it now. Thanks