I've deleted LRT Line 6 East Extension since there is no evidence that this proposed railway already has ROW acquired or being acquired so the alignment is extremely speculative at this point. Elements added to the map is just clutter right now.

Ref. discussion: changeset/129153518

I've deleted LRT Line 6D since there is no evidence that this proposed railway already has ROW acquired or being acquired so the alignment is extremely speculative at this point. Elements added to the map is just clutter at this point.

Ref. discussion: changeset/129153518

Hi! Do you have any evidence that this project has gone past the proposal stage and that this project will definitely be constructed within the next few years? If not, then I don't think these should be added to OSM.

Changeset comment correction: 5 barangays instead of 4

@goldabaoy, may I know what team you are referring to in your comment? I looked at your profile and it is blank: it doesn't indicate which team you are affiliated with.

To clarify, the Baguio relation itself is admin_level=6 just like any other city or municipality in the country. But their boundary ways is at least admin_level=6 for borders with other HUCs (like Cebu-Mandaue boundary) or admin_level=4/3 for borders with surrounding provinces to reflect the fact that HUCs are administratively independent of provinces.

Compared to your Manila, LP, and P'que locations, this (Tirona-Aguinaldo junction) is actually a defensible place. But I kinda agree with TagaSanPedroAko here. The Bacoor junction seems like the more "downtown" area of the city, and an even central junction to various transportation routes. I generally prefer putting place nodes at the poblacion but I could be easily convinced that TagaSanPedroAko' preferred location is also good.

Why place the node at this nondescript location along the river? Having the node at or near the Lawton area is the best place for this because this is beside the old city of Intramuros, almost adjacent to the city hall, and is the hub of various transportation routes that terminate in Manila.

Alternate locations that is much better than your preferred location would be Plaza Roma in Intramuros, or even near Km. 0 at Luneta.

I disagree with this movement. I'm a native of Las Piñas and the city hall compound is not as "central" or "important" as you may think. The poblacion area is culturally significant (Bamboo Organ Church) and is the centerpiece of the Las Piñas historic corridor.

As for Parañaque, the city hall location is even worse than your proposed Las Piñas' location which at least is along a major road. P'que's city hall is tucked inside a very residential area and is hardly the place where people think of when they hear "Parañaque". A place along Sucat Road would have been slightly better, but there's no obvious "central" place there. So the poblacion area, which is the cultural center of the city, and where the cathedral of the Diocese of Parañaque is located, where the Ospital ng Parañaque is located, and where major schools are found is a better choice.

Hi, Rally. May I know why you deleted the following 2 service ways?

way/166262771
way/166119448

These exist based on my local knowledge.

I think the correct URL is https://www.buoyweather.com/

"Buoy" was misspelled.

Same with polygon 27788686 for S&R

GOwin, you converted MC Home Depot from a building to a landuse and added parking lanes. I am quite sure that this is a rooftop parking area, and the whole polygon 39723791 is still a building.

When updating the population, don't forget to update the population:date=* tag to the value "2020-05-01". Also, do the same for the boundary relation if it exists.

Sorry, but I disagree with you. The role values "admin_centre", "outer", and "inner" are only mandated for boundary=administrative relations which is the main focus of the wiki page you linked.

"admin_centre" especially doesn't make sense for religious boundaries.

Hindi ikaw ang boss ko. At bilang boluntaryo, minamapa ko ang aking nais imapa at hindi kung anong gusto mo.

Hi! I noticed you are adding municipal boundary relations from the COD database which is originally derived from the PSA dataset. Please note that PSA has not given permission for their boundaries to be widely distributed, which would happen if they are added into OSM.

Hi! I see that you modified the Cavite-Batangas boundary to "follow mountains". Do you have a source such as a Republic Act or something else that specifies that the boundary actually follows ridgelines?

Question: Do you hide non-road features or only download roads? For example: when you split Loyola Street to add road-related tags in this changeset, you inadvertently broke two boundary relations.

Tip: When splitting a closed coastline that also has a place=island/islet tag, don't forget to create a multipolygon relation for the island and transfer the island-related tags from the split coastline ways to the relation.

See: relation/12688075