Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)
Šajās izmaiņās nedaudz nepareizi nomainījās šī te garāžu teritorija (pazuda puse teritorijas): way/154745145/history

Vai ir zināms, kā tas gadījās?

The note on addr:steet missing acknowledged, couldn't easily figure it out on the ground (the number plate did not specify the street). Looking at it now, made a guess and added addr:street.
There's a popular opinion that addr:city should be inferred, thus skipping that one.

Great, thank you for checking that :)

Everybody, please take a moment away from the keyboard.
Let's keep things civil and polite.

Mapping this node as historic=castle might be a bit misleading - there do not seem to be even any ruins for several centuries by now.
Is there at least a hill?

Sveiki, 2017. gadā dažas ielas pie Saulkrastiem tika nomainītas no access=destination uz access=private, bet tur tagad cauri iet Jūrtaka.
Vai tās tiešām ir "private", nevis "destination"?
Piemērs: way/70117367/history .

Sounds good, thank you for the quick reply.

This changeset added a duplicate building over an existing one, way/654246503/history - I cleaned it up.
Might be worth checking the workflow on how the original building was not spotted.

Šīs izmaiņas aizvietoja tourism=attraction Lauču akmenim ar natural=stone. Lai gan stone tags ir vērtīgs, pats objekts tomēr ir pietiekami slavens, pievienoju tourism=attraction tagu.

Thank you for the response and all the map improvements, it's now much more clear what happened there.

Perhaps it is worth leaving a comment such changesets to see whether the original mapper can improve the situation themselves, and to avoid miscommunication.

I see that most of the detail has been re-mapped, I hope it is of much better quality now.

Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem.
Būtu jauki, ja varētu tos sadalīt pa mazākiem reģioniem, un pierakstīt nedaudz detalizētāku komentāru - citiem kopienas dalībniekiem ļoti grūti izsekot izmaiņām, kuras aptver visu Latvijas teritoriju.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.

Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.