Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this changeset added two untagged ways, way/655966964 and way/655966965 - this duplicated some of the existing ways and did not seem useful so I have reverted this changeset. Please let me know if there was an intent I have missed.

Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this changeset added an untagged way, way/655967272 - this duplicated the existing track and did not seem useful so I have reverted this changeset. Please let me know if there was an intent I have missed.

Hi, I noticed that this changeset has created a new water area that overlaps with older water areas, and seems to include some non-water, based on ortophoto.
osm.org/#map=17/57.11687/24.67541

What's the source of this area, was this a mechanical edit?

Hi there and thank you for the improvements to OSM.
This changeset added building=yes to way/132364752 . From the imagery it is obvious that this whole area is not a building, so I have removed this tag.
Could you please check whether you have added building=yes to similar ways, and if so, remove it?
Thank you and happy mapping :)

Ah, that's great - thank you for improving the map and for the quick reply.

Hi there. Addresses do not have a requirement to be on buildings, quite the opposite - they are even legally points in some countries. Have you removed any other addresses that were mapped as points?

this changeset added several large "buildings" where actually multiple smaller buildings exist. one of these huge buildings is not shown to exist in any of the imagery layers - way/471741241 . i will remove this one and add notes to the ones that need fixing.

dear coventry32, you have continued adding such fake features. that's really not cool, as people are creating a wonderful, free resource for all to use.

hi there. could you please clarify what is the data source for these additions/edits ?

hi. several of these ways look unlikely to be useful - like one 5-node "hook" over the buildings in ogre. was this by any chance direct conversion of a gps track ?
would you have the time to check all of the ways in the changeset and clean up any that were added accidentally ?

even the referenced page says "...forest, also called a park"; it also says "the local council plans to convert part of the forest into a park".
this should be clarified/surveyed, and if some parts have been converted to a park, they should be mapped accordingly. the whole area should not be changed to a park.
i will change this back to forest for now and will contact all individual mappers who have expressed interest in this area (at least 3 so far) - let's discuss this in detail and come up with a correct tagging.

hi there. it seemed a bit unlikely that a shopping centre would be operating an atm, so i have reverted this change.
please let me me know what was the intended change here.

Yes, this does seem to be PokemonGO inspired. Some of it is not vandalism, looks like genuine improvements - although maybe slightly misguided.
If the editors stay around and "upgrade" to quality map editing, we all stand to benefit.
To the new editors: don't be discouraged to make good edits, just keep on mapping what really exists, and don't stretch the map to reach goals on some game - we appreciate your input a lot :)

the "Ezera vārti" memorial, what is that and where exactly is it located ? at the current location, nothing of interest can be seen on the mapillary imagery.

could you please take images (see www.mapillary.com for detail), upload them and share the link here ?

thanks for the map update - what is the name of the added hostel ?

Most of these looked like paths, I have modified them accordingly.

If that does not seem to be correct, you could you please provide Mapillary images of the area ? See www.mapillary.com for more detail.

Thank you for the map improvements. What was added here as a park did not seem to be a park actually - no official note I could find at http://www.rigasmezi.lv/lv/Rigas_darzi_un_parki/par_parkiem/Darzi_un_parki_Pardaugavas_iecirknis/ .
I have removed the park designation in OpenStreetMap, too.

This one indeed designated as a park - thank you for spotting :)
http://www.rigasmezi.lv/lv/Rigas_darzi_un_parki/par_parkiem/Darzi_un_parki_Pardaugavas_iecirknis/

I changed it to use the official name, and added the previous name in the loc_name tag.

I cleaned up the duplicate here, but getting back to the topic of the object itself - the name seems to be describing a memorial. What indicates that it is not one ?

Have all of these been surveyed to be designated footways?

If you have a chance, could you please add Mapillary images of these footways ?
See https://www.mapillary.com/ for the detail.