Should way/1185384005/history perhaps be building=construction ?
At least it seems so from https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=819781419262974 .

Duh, indeed. Thanks, fixed now.

Probably, I was following the simpler approach that's feasible in a mobile editor for me - hopefully that's easier to update once the approximate layout is there :)

Thanks, is the part from P6 to the lift gate also inaccessible?
If the road is traversible by pedestrians/cyclists, maybe better to mark it as motor vehicle inaccessible instead?

Noted, thank you so much for the updates.
If map drawing seems interesting enough, it might also be useful to chat with the Latvian OSM community at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .

Similarly, this changeset deletes a bunch of tracks - were they completely gone?

Hi, thank you for the map improvements.

This changeset deletes several tracks - are they completely gone, or was there some other change?

Got it, thanks - that makes sense, mapping fences that limit movement is very useful.
One more reason to map them separate, not on landuse - currently the adjacent residential landuse areas have fence tag applied, sort of implying double fence. And if fence type tags get added, there could easily be two conflicting types tagged on the sane stretch.

Hi, thank you so much for the great map improvements :)
Looking at orthophoto, way/1155849240/history does not seem to be fenced, and it's not clear whether way/1155849241/history is fully fenced. Have they been surveyed to be so?

We also recently discussed landuse and fence mapping, and in general it seems better not to use landuse and barrier tags on the same objects, tagging fences (and walls etc) as separate ways only where they are known to exist (https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/neapvienot.20landuse.3D*.20un.20barrier.3Dfence) - does that sound good?

Hmm, paga, Google Earth?
Mēs nedrīkstam to izmantot necik. Ja veikti labojumi no jebkādiem Google servisiem, tie jāatceļ.
Vai ir vēl kādi līdzīgi labojumi, kuri būtu atceļami šādu autortiesību problēmu dēļ?

Sveiki, te Siguldas Jaunās pils parkā pievienoti vairāki akmeņi. Dabā tādus neredzu, un ortofoto vispār pavecs (mainījušies celiņi utt). No kādiem datiem šie akmeņi zīmēti?

Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements.
The road added in this changeset, way/1196532494 , is not connected to other roads. This causes problems for routing applications.
Do you happen to know how this road connects to other roads and would have a chance to update that?

Looks like you moved the node already - node/2370468014 .
Perfect, thank you so much :)
If you feel like further improving the map, please consider joining the Latvian OSM community chat at https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .

Hi, way/1193998524 currently has width=0.
Should it perhaps be changed to highway=path instead?

This change will be automatically reverted, as the addresses are updated from the official sources.
Should this node perhaps be moved to "Ulmaņa parks 2" instead?

Checking further, 11A is another building - way/123080910 . Should the address change be reverted?

Thank you for the map updates.
Address information is automatically synced from the official data sources, and would be overwritten in near future.
Where does the information about "11A" come from?

Also, the ATM node is currently outside the building - would you happen to know where exactly it is located?

Rūpīgāk paskatoties, laikam bija domāts Ozolu ielas posms (mazliet vairāk uz DR). Palaboju saskaņā ar dažādiem datu avotiem - vai šādi izskatās pareizi?

Sveiki, paldies papildinājumiem.
Spriežot pēc ortofoto un reljefa modeļa, šo ceļu būtu labāk apzīmēt ar highway=track.
Aicinām ceļu klasifikāciju un citas tēmas apspriest arī kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .

Yeah, sorry about the confusion :)