Hi, your changes remove a lot of mapped forest areas - for example:
relation/1923404/history

way/142086146/history
way/142085348/history
way/142085287/history
way/142084972/history

Why so?

Jā, un uzreiz var redzēt smukāku karti, un tad vēl uzlabojumi nonāk mobilajās aplikācijās...
Nedaudz palīdz sazīmēta karte, jo tad mazāk acīmredzamu uzlabojumu :)

Es te vēl nedaudz paspēlējos ar ceļu savienojumiem (lai ir savstarpēji savienoti, lai nav savienoti ar landuse utt) - varbūt sanāk paskatīties, vai viss joprojām izskatās pareizi :)

Sveiki un liels paldies par kartes papildinājumiem :)
Pamanīju dažus nesavienotus ceļus - piemēram:
way/971383217
way/971382919

Ceļiem (ways) vajadzētu būt savienotiem ar citiem ceļiem, ja tur dzīvē iespējams pārvietoties.
Savienotiem - jābūt kopīgiem punktiem (nodes).
Kopīgiem punktiem nevajadzētu būt ar landuse=*, amenity=parking un tamlīdzīgiem objektiem.

osm.wiki/Unconnected_ways ir nedaudz sīkāk par iD redaktora lietošanu - un ja ir kādi jautājumi, priecāšos palīdzēt :)

Heya, thank you for checking.
If these were separate, named streets, "residential" would be a good fit indeed - otherwise, I'd stick with "service".
In our recent mapping party here we didn't get to these streets - will check with locals :)

Layer part - it was probably intended to fix the error with the intersecting building, but that's not the correct solution in this case, of course.
Splitting the way, having common nodes at the building intersections and marking the segment correctly seems the most common approach.

Noteikti nav obligāti - biju domājis esošu tagu noņemšanu. Šo tagu neesamība parasti apzīmē info trūkumu (nezinām, vai ir vai nav), bet shelter=no/bench=no nozīmē precizējumu - pārbaudīts, ka nav.
Vismaz dažām pieturām, kuras nesen biju pārbaudījis, pieliku atpakaļ :)

Čau, pamanīju, ka pieturām noņemti shelter/bench tagi - piemēram, node/3431637984/history .
Kādēļ tā?

Wonderful, thank you so much :)

Hi, I asked around - indeed, non-subscriber messages to talk-lv are dropped (as majority of them is spam anyway).
You are correct, talk-lv is the main communication channel for Latvia.
May I suggest to subscribe to the list, and post again? That way the message will go through, and you will be less likely to miss any responses.

Ah, thanks - was tabbing too quickly through the input fields.
Fixed now.

Hi and thank you for the map improvements.
In this changeset, way/910683506/history was added as highway=residential.
Given that it is marked as private (can be seen in Mapillary images), I've changed it to highway=service and access=private.

Hi, thank you for the recent map improvements in Latvia (which also includes at least Bolt002, 009 and 010).
In osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activites/Bolt , it is stated that "We are constantly in contact with the local community through the local talk list", but there does not seem to be any recent communication on this in the talk-lv mailing list.

Is there some thread I have missed there?

Heya, usually I start with LĢIA ortophoto (recently also added in iD index, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2021-January/006198.html ), and compare with Maxar layers (usually more recent imagery but needs manual alignment), sometimes also with the LIDAR surface model, available at https://www.lvmgeo.lv/dati .

Perrrrfect, thank you - glad I didn't just delete it :)

Heya, don't see this shop in Mapillary images or ortophotos - what was it, where is it located?
node/2140260603/history

Hi, this changeset has added multiple strange footways that do not seem to match surface model / ortophotos:
osm.org/#map=16/57.8047/25.2223

Also a footway named "Rūnnu ZĪmes tak":
way/579496738

What are these, what's the source, and where do the names come from?

This changeset damages pharmacy data for the 3rd time.
Reverted in #94951717.

Sveiki, kāds ir datu avots šim objektam?
way/794405569

Izskatās pēc bijušās dzelzceļa līnijas atrašanās vietas, bet šobrīd vismaz konkrētā posma rietumpusē laikam nav pat path, kur nu vēl track...

Hi Asumarin, thank you for your contributions.
Unfortunately, there are several issues with this changeset.
a) This is an undiscussed mass edit.
b) This breaks data by incorrectly changing amenity=pharmacy into amenity=veterinary. I have reverted this changeset.

I also noticed that you are doing a large number of mass edits in many countries, many of them being disputed - and receiving no responses: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9644791 .

While we value all contributions to OSM, could you please pause any mass edits and go over https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ?

Please do not resume editing until the organised editing guidelines are fully implemented.
If there are any questions about the guidelines or the implementation, please feel free to ask in public forums or send me a private message, and I'll be happy to help.

Super, milzu paldies par uzlabojumiem :)