The shops I know had both Д-р Стефанов and Нечовеши магазин on the shopfront. If they removed Д-р Стефанов, that must be recent. Нечовеши магазин sounds more like an advertising slogan and a description than a name.

I'm sorry but I don't think your changes are correct. According to https://zoomagazin.eu/bg/za-nas the chain is called Верига зоомагазини "Д-р Стефанов" There is also a brand preset for the chain with the name Д-р Стефанов Please revert your edits

Sorry, my mistake, now corrected

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding the restaurant. However you must have used an old version of the map because I also added that restaurant a month ago. I will remove your duplicate and add facebook link and phone nr to mine.

Good idea to map the sidewalk! Thanks

I can't find out what you changed here... Walking from the south on one of the paths, you first step down on the road (raised kerb), then cross it (informal crossing because there are no markings on the road, no lowered kerbs, etc.), step up on the sidewalk on the other side (raised kerb again) and then go down from the sidewalk down the steps. I think it was correctly mapped. See https://maps.app.goo.gl/R63iZ6CgHnRk1rH4A

Thanks! That area is next on my to-do list for survey (after the holidays probably)

It's rarely used. I added them but kept the notes. Thanks!

I agree that removal of building names and the construction area should be reverted

Didn't know about that convention... The pavement you added was repaved all the way to the end of the street, except in front of new buildings that already had good pavement. The one ont eh opposite side was repaved a couple of years ago, and even has tactile paving!
I think sidewalks should be either added as tag to the street, or mapped separately for larger streets (boulevards) only or for all streets in a neighbourhood (like it is in the centre, for instance).

I hope you don't mind that I deleted the partial sidewalk you added along Yakubitsa. I think we shouldn't mix the 2 ways of mapping sidewalks within one street. Maybe we should have a discussion to develop our own "Regional convention" on how to map sidewalks... osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Regional_conventions

Yes, please revert

Done! In OSM, the name=* tag is strictly reserved for an object's name, so it should not be used for descriptions (there's description=* for that).

Thanks! In that case it's better to tag it with disused:amenity=restaurant and delete all other tags that are no longer relevant (I just did that).

Temporary closed, or permanently?

Thanks for your edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Is "Muddy meadow" really the name of that piece of land, or a description of it? Maybe it would be better described with amenity=car_park and surface=mud?

OK. I put it up for discussion here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/motorway-status-of/122136 and hope that will solve the issue. Please add your opinion.

We should map the on-the-ground truth. It is a fact that the ways you edited do not have motorway legal status (you can ride a bike or a horse on it if you like), so it is not a motorway. That the kilometer marks start earlier than the motorway is confusing, but not a reason to consider it a motorway, I think. Same for the section at Правешки ханове: it is legally not a motorway (although you can't legally reach it on horseback). You mention that it was discussed (where?) but you are the only one reverting edits by others who think it should be tagged as a trunk or primary road.

Again, if you don't understand why someone made edits, please contact that mapper and ask why instead of reverting edits.

Hi, I think you made a mistake here. I think there are a OBB and a Postbank next to each other, and you changed the OBB to a Postbank that is already mapped?