OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
154562209

We were there on Friday: for many years there were no edits on that path and now there were two OSM contributors almost at the same time!
I made the change, see changeset/154610522 I tagged the lower part of the path as sac scale T3 and removed the security rope tag

154562209

See also https://kade.si/#map=17/2642356.62/5186857.73/0

154562209

Hi, I noticed your edits on way/1304447168 Do you have local knowledge, or was it based only on my note there? We were on the North side of Sivri Chal, but bypassed that difficult part via way/1304632720 (I just added it). I could see that the safety rope starts a little further up than where way/1304447168 and 1304632720 split (node/1696565781), so way/1696565781 should be split there and the northern part should not have safety_rope=yes (sac_scale is also less there). Can you do it, or shall I do it?

154351533

highway=track is allowed to be used by foot, bicycle and motor vehicles by default, so it's not necessary to add this (it's not wrong either, just a waste of time...)

135778334

Done! Eerst maar eens zien of dit überhaupt bestaat...

135778334

Er is een Paalkamp Middelkamp bij de Lutte (52°19’23.7″N 6°57’46.7″E). Is dit hier een duplicaat van op de verkeerde plaats?

152384242

I noticed on "latest changes" that someone removed the name Кюстендил, which seems OK because that street only starts further west. I looked on cadastre, where the area of that street is on the same plot as bul Bulgaria, and because it's parallel to it, it seemed the most logical name for that street. It's not used in the address of any buildings adjacent to it.

151277529

Added the building, see changeset/151302325

151277529

I saw from a distance that it moved, so I thought it would be an improvement to place the node at its new location. I hope to go there again today and survey the building

150532649

Thanks for reacting on my note before I had a chance to do it myself. I think it is preferable, though, to add the lifecycle prefix demolished: instead of deleting a building that is still visible on aerial images to prevent some armchair mapper to add it again.

149300840

I saw this confusion before. Another one is сладкарница which is often tagged with shop=confectionery while I think it should be shop=pastry

149300840

Here https://app.transifex.com/openstreetmap/id-editor/language/bg/ is where the translation is done. You need to make an account to be able to edit it. Another great way to contribute to OSM...

149300840

I noticed that you changed the tag for the bust of Христо Ботев (and maybe others) from historic=memorial to historic=monument. According to the wiki (historic=monument), a monument is "especially large" (like a building). I think the memorial tag is more appropriate here.

149274979

Благодаря! It doesn't have an iD preset so I didn't find it...

148920222

There is no space for a shop in between the beauty shop and the pizza fast food. I moved the shops a bit to show this

148624982

Hi, thanks for adding more detail to this restaurant! However I reverted some of your edits: I think the restaurant name should be as shown on the building, preferably in Bulgarian. If it has a name also in latin script, it should be added as int_name=* Please avoid using descriptive names: amenity=restaurant already tells that it's a restaurant, so that should not be repeated in the name= It calls itself "Russian Restaurant", so cuisine=russian. Where do you get your information about the payment methods you added?

148349559

I did most of this with StreetComplete, and the main issue was that often quest pins of shops on different floors overlap and you have to go up/downstairs a lot... but it's a nice place to survey on a rainy day!
See also osm.wiki/Indoor_Mapping#Apps

147785324

https://www.facebook.com/spasisofia/posts/pfbid02xiWxH9j18Len7BFE9oHcYnE3iJRwK9hZdyJguJbF6Cw18d5BPXAyxDk1T5DCB9WDl

147785324

I suppose turn:lanes=none|left|through|right and access:lanes=no|yes|yes|yes have the same effect on access of normal traffic, so one of them can be removed

147785324

Isn't that already described by access:lanes=no|yes|yes|yes
bus:lanes=designated|yes|yes|yes ? I'm not sure your addition is an improvement...