rajdhani's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181727919 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181832523 |
|
| 181724998 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181831840 |
|
| 181654800 | Reverted in changeset id:181817662 |
|
| 181726959 | Reverted in changeset id:181757956 |
|
| 181659926 | Reverted in changeset id:181745375 |
|
| 181684540 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181712780 |
|
| 181581538 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181657542 |
|
| 181583678 | Reverted in changeset id:181640701 |
|
| 181546270 | Reverted in changeset id:181577356 |
|
| 181524002 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181576573 |
|
| 181522429 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181574372 |
|
| 181574372 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181574372 |
|
| 181529590 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181570571 |
|
| 180408368 | Hi CRCulver, Thank you for your valuable feedback and efforts to make the correction for identified errors. The highway=crossing tag was not intentionally added to a random node. It was an existing node I should have removed during the dual-to-single-carriageway conversion, but I missed that during self-QC. Since there was no physical barrier in the latest imagery (only painted markings), I followed general OSM guidelines. So I also failed to catch the country-specific handling for this type of cases. The issue has now been reviewed internally as well, and we will adopt more strict validation checks and follow country-specific guidelines for similar cases going forward. |
|
| 181537881 | Reverted in changeset id:181556839 |
|
| 180975058 | Reverted in changeset id:181038541 |
|
| 180990445 | Reverted in changeset id:181034305 |
|
| 180972539 | Partially reverted in changeset id:181028386 |
|
| 180923714 | Partially reverted in changeset id:180993854 |
|
| 180964738 | Reverted in changeset id:180988779 |