No buildings, no supermarked, but parking cars. Where is your local knowledge? Your mapping looks more like vandalism to me!

Most of these buildings are quite small.
Some are less than 5 m² in size.
To me, that also seems a bit suspicious.

Vor einiger Zeit hatte ich mich auch schon mal daran probiert. Allerdings ist mir JOSM dabei mehrmals eingefroren.

node/6430580686#map=19/-9.73568/32.68484

Please be careful when moving long ways. Consider to adjust the imagery layer instead. Most of this roads are to narrow for four-wheeled vehicles. "highway=path" would be more appropriate

Where is the road

Review:
Please notice the new geometry

drunter und drüber
Hello Tafadzwa_bere,
I would suggest a little more practice before starting.
Please be careful with the name tag.
way/1037319645
way/216964989
way/1037324165
changeset/118123087
way/1037323742
way/1037326494
way/265935662

Viel Erfolg!

way/407837170
way/450622201
way/450622127
way/259885701
way/620815144

Hello Raenbow,
we need some patience. Most new residential areas have a similar looking road network. With a little experience and the existing building footprints, you can predict
the course of the road.
These curvy streets will almost certainly change or disappear one day. Here are some examples of streets that were tagged as residential roads too soon:
way/653865189
way/106353261
way/862882723
way/655522964
The problem is finding such fake streets in dense urban areas. I would like to know if the Adt will systematically revise and update their edits.

simplify your roads, guess the future layout, instead of mapping yesterdays sat images,

way/1035155610
should not be mapped

way/1035155610

is not a residential road,

https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#ext=29.46349,0.41478,29.48033,0.42560&active=26083&localChangesOnly=true

The residents left because of unsafe conditions, I would guess.

It is not a good idea to map here with oblique images from only one source

Hello,
could you please check your changes on this road with maxar premium beta?
way/28675440

ich habe es mal auf covered=yes geändert.
covered=*
Gruß Ralf

Hello simoa,
please have a look here:
way/1023706889
maxar premium beta is more recent than the project imagery!
These two buildings do not have shared nodes. There is even a road between them.
way/1020255842
way/1020255842
Refere to maxar.
Please notice also the incorrect layer tag.
Hot's Mogadishu projects mainly produce garbage because participants rely on only one imagery source.

please see my comment here:
changeset/116589105

Hi simoa, this bug was introduced by project 11382 and therefor it should be fixed by project 11382. Also the original mapper should be notified by a validator. Imo this is a kind of bug that should not stay in the database longer than necessary. It is hard to miss and also easy to fix.