Hi,
it's up to you i would say.
Removing the oneway tag and the overlapping segment (way/653847215) would be the simplest fix. Redrawing with two separated lanes imo the more accurate solution. Bing provides the best imagery here.

Hi,
way/653847214 is causing problems now
(oneway=yes)
Its the rest of a dual carriage way mapping. I would prefer to restore the previous state.

Hi,
way/442415023
highway=unclassified?

I think @SColchester is the person to adress
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10067

node/7524131566
not rout able without access tags

I would consider to tag roads servicing only one or a small group of buildings as "highway=service" Also I would recommend to search and remove all roads and paths shorter then a certain length. (<100m for example - remove bridges and fords from the selection) way/799114559
way/803342041
You can do this easily with the search tool in JOSM. This will remove a lot of the tile mapping artefacts and provide a better staring point for validation.

@Puxan please give us some examples.
like close to here:
node/7443624637/history
why were this ways drawn at all and who validated here?

Alternativ kannst du auch den Weg way/888597236 löschen und den Rest wieder verbinden. Dann ist die Rechtsabbiegespur weg. Man kann hier meiner Meinung nach aber zweispurig links abbiegen.

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ROIEN3qQfqVUWbZTxROdGs

Achte mal auf die abgenutzten Fahrbahnmarkierungen, die Ampel und auf den Kombi der rechts vorbeifährt.

Die Abbiegespur nach rechts ist meiner Ansicht nach bei OSM eine Ermessenssache. Nach deiner Bearbeitung sind die Anzahl der destination:lanes und der turn:lanes nun nicht mehr gleich. Das ist definitiv nicht richtig! Ich habe gerade nochmal eine Bildsequenz nach mapillary hochgeladen. Sobald diese veröffentlicht wird, reiche ich einen Link nach.

Wenn du es schon nicht lassen kannst dann pass wenigstens die destination:lanes auch entsprechend an.

http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/#way=888597236&namedroutes=1fromarrow=0&include_sgn=1&include_way=1&country=DE

Wobei du von der Sache her eigentlich recht hattest. Ich versuche mich mal in einer etwas detaillierteren Bearbeitung.

Hallo Lokalfürst, hör doch bitte mal auf die Lane Attribute ständig durcheinander zu mengen!

Thank you,
the main street is at least continuous again. IMO the minor roads still suffer a lot from AI misinterpretations and outdated imagery. But that was not the Issue. Is there a reference area in Tanzania for this mapping project?

Hi, there is still a big gap between way/180798561 and way/180798561. The nodes are still there. I think you should redraw the road manually. At way/180798564 you need to remove the T1 ref tag.

@iMoyo @sifelani

Hello, I have added or corrected some buildings nearby.
way/883941810/history
Please try to improve or redraw the rest by yourself.

Something has gone wrong again!
You do not like the T1 trunk road? :)

Hello, are these house numbers official? The OSM data here is already a little bit aged . The numbers always seem to be continuous to me. But there are some gaps where new buildings were built. Please switch to maxxar background and check e.g. the gap between Z24 and Z25. Or please note that Z31 has disappeared and instead there is a new larger building.

Hi Quinten, sorry for my bad English. I think we have a big misunderstanding here :). I thought you were about to organize such an event because of your relationship with CartOng and the MSF.