Sorry about that. I've broken one of the basic rules. I thought I had been through this roundabout, so I apologize for confusing it with another one. Thanks for checking my edits. I'll make sure to verify what I'm doing with on-the-ground survey.

Would this actually be a path? Usually footway is used for sidewalks (paved). Also, notice the path that this parallels. Maybe those should be a single way.

Fair point. Editing may have been a better term. While nothing was seriously broken (routing issues, for instance), there were a lot of topological inconsistencies, so I made some changes to that. I apologize for deleting and redrawing the museum. I did not think about the history of changesets that would be removed. I will consider that in future.

My apologies. I should have phrased the changeset comment differently. I also apologize for entering your mapping territory. I understand your comments, and I didn't think about the issues for routing it would create.

I have reverted the deletion of the Pride Hill way. If there are other issues, let me know.

Wasn't there a big old discussion about half a year back about how the parade route SHOULD NOT be a separate way? It is not a separate path, and should not be mapped as one. DON'T TAG FOR THE RENDERER. The parade route should be if anything a route multi.