Hi, you have placed two defibrillators in the same spot in the middle of the road. Shall I delete both and you can place one at the place where it actually lives.

Hi, I have reverted the changeset.
changeset/175987331

I expect there are different ways to map the area. To get some ideas you could have a look at how other dual use defence and civil airports have been mapped. Darwin airport and RAAF Base Williamtown and RAAF Base Learmonth come to mind but there are others elsewhere in the world.
I would probably start with a polygon surrounding the entire area and then separate polygons for each within that area. So as not to duplicate the ways you would need a multipolygon for each of these.
I would not have a multipolygon containing the two rings that share a side...just leave as a group of simpler polygons.
Hope this helps.

Mapped an early version.

This is an interesting addition by Uber team as on later Esri imagery this area is cleared and a shopping centre under development and unlikely that Uber drivers are traversing this driveway. Or are you mapping solely based on old Bing imager?

Reverted in changeset/175706429 as in error.

This is some text from osm inspector (areas)…
Old-style multipolygons
Multipolygon relations with tags on the (outer) ways instead of on the relation. This is deprecated and should not be used any more. Move the tags from the outer ways to the relation.

If a ring of the relation really has an individual name then that can be added to that particular way. But, the name of the relation should only be added to the relation and not to the outer ways.

Hi, please do not add names to the ways than form the bounds of the boundary relation or multipolygons. The name is only added to the relation and not to the individual ways that form the polygons. The outer ways are left untagged. Please read the wiki on this.
I expect that all the names you have added to the outer ways will need to be reverted.

Hi, the web site hours for the Moore Park Beach clinic has it closed on Sat and open on Sun.

Thanks, I have deleted the duplicate.

Hi, you have placed two defibrillators on the same spot here. Are there two or should one be deleted?

Hi, there appears to be an overlap here
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.81914&lat=-31.97845&zoom=15

Building looks much better now :)

The building you have added is not very close to it's shape.

Our wiki has more info
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Hi multipolygons cannot share outer rings.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.76863&lat=-19.24681&zoom=15

Hi, this is mapped as a relation and the name is only added to the relation...not the outer ways.

Thanks for mapping this. These new areas are not complete in Capad 2024 and I couldn’t readily find a source available to osm to use to add them all yet. I’ll work through Capad 2024 changes for now. The areas may meet the Capad criteria to make it into Capad 2026 but that won’t be available until 2027. So hopefully a solution is found before then.

I see you have added names to outer ways of a few individual areas of other NP sections.
I now think that is a valid way to name explicit parts with the parks.