I don't see where this is posted for discussion, and tagging seems unclear. Would suggest you clarify or delete

Did you mistype? Either the name or the tag is wrong

Hi, not to say you *can't* do this, but landuse=residential is really not meant for each individual parcel. See landuse=residential

To expand on user_5329's comment, it would be helpful if you could use some tags for this object, certainly access=* would apply (access=*), and maybe something like leisure=bird_hide? Also I'm confused because you say it's off limits, but it appears to be quite open to visitors? http://www.hawkridge.org/research/bird-banding/

Hi, thanks for editing in Minnesota. I'm noticing some of your landuse areas that have "holes" inside them do not use multipolygon relations. For example, see the pond on the east side of way/442267234. Please see osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon for more info on using multipolygon relations. Cheers

Also, if you want people to find your office, you should tag it properly--for example see office=lawyer

Welcome to OSM! Just as an fyi, the surrounding building is also tagged as a Dairy Queen, so this node probably isn't necessary. OSM tries to have each feature in OSM once (see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element)

great, thanks!

hi, I'm confused by your tagging here, can you explain or fix?

great, thanks!

Hi, puzzled why you added separate bike lanes along Summit Ave in St Paul. Those have been tagged for a long time on the street way, which is according to the tagging guidelines at cycleway=*

Hi, the Lamalpig Gym Club should probably be tagged leisure=fitness_centre instead of amenity=fitness. See osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre

Hi, way/328565829 should probably be tagged leisure=fitness_centre instead of amenity=fitness. See osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre

I think using motorway_link for the new way you added is incorrect. These are more like service roads that are only to be used by authorized vehicles

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! There is already a feature for Rosedale Center (way/37188166) Please consider updating that with the address and contact information on this node, then deleting the node. Also note that OSM is for factual details only, and not advertising.

hi, noticed in this changeset that 1) your footways at crossings do not connect with the streets, and 2) you added separate cycleways along 14th St NW but those are already tagged on the street as cycleway=lane, which seems the preferred way to do it--see cycleway=*

The building_1 etc tags on these buildings are confusing. Are you trying to indicate what offices/departments are found in each building? Then it is probably better to place that information on nodes placed within the building's footprint. Also, please don't use abbreviations in names ("Bldg. 20"), just spell it out ("Building 20")

Instead of putting "handicap accessible" in a footway's name, please use tagging such as wheelchair=yes wheelchair=*

natural=bay seems a bit odd for Knowledge Beginnings?

why is the same poi entered multiple times? see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element