Please look at the area more closely before adding your data--there was already a repair station node at Seward Co-op, you could've added to it rather than creating duplicate data!

Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! However, it's very unusual to put the name of current owner/occupant of a private residence into OSM. Also, some of your tagging (such as a house as a place of worship) seem questionable. Take a look, and reply back if you have questions.

just noticed that the corners got mistakenly tagged on a bunch of buildings (on 8th Ave btw 5th & 6th St)

Hi, wondering what the area is that has no tags other than the name in Chinese???

Hi, OSM is for actual physical features, not jokes, commentary, or vandalism. I have deleted the "death zones", but you are welcome to add actual data to the map!

Welcome to OSM! Please note that OSM is (with a couple exceptions) for verifiable physical features--it is not for property boundaries. Your county probably has more accurate property boundaries anyway :)

Confused as to what is under construction in the NW corner of this changeset. If it's the roads, then the roads should be tagged with construction. If it's housing, then I would expect a larger area.

It's not too bad, if you want to give it a go: when a "normal" (two-way) road like this has a bike lane on each side, you can just add cycleway=lane to the road way. You'd only create a separate highway=cycleway way if it is truly separated from the road.

Welcome to OSM! Wondering, is there a bike lane here? I don't see it on Hennepin Cty maps. If so, it should be tagged on the road way (see osm.wiki/Bicycle)

regarding the West Lima way, if you're trying to show the legal boundary, use boundary=administrative. if you're trying to show landuse, most of the city appears to be landuse=residential. there's more info on these tags as well as place tags on the OSM wiki: osm.wiki

you're doing some very detailed mapping here, but I'm curious why some of it is mapped the way it is. for example, way/353841066 seems like it should be a multipolygon relation (with an outer and inner part). and there are lots of adjacent identical landuses, with no clear reason why they are separated (for example, see ways 353839774 and 353839776)

yes, I see now that wheelmap has a very limited set of options for features

I had heard of wheelmap but hadn't looked closely until now. It seems odd that some buildings show up there and others don't. Pretty much all things that "look" like buildings on the map at wheelmap.org are buildings in OSM. You can add the same info directly via OSM.org, but it's not quite as easy :(

Hi, this info on wheelchair accessibility is really useful, but if there is an existing building drawn, can you add it to that building's way instead of creating a new point? I did so on Coffman, but left Kolthoff and Smith if you want to do those. Thanks!

Hi, I think you mistagged the MN Kali Group as a bank. Should probably be amenity=dojo. Thanks for mapping!

wondering why you made this a coastline?? that tag is reserved for ocean coasts only (the great lakes are a notable exception) because it's much harder to deal with both in editing and rendering

Hey lizzzzz, fyi, I'm changing the LifeTime to leisure=fitness_centre, per discussion on osm.wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre. Let me know if Qs

Hi, noticed that you appear relatively new, and just wanted to point out a couple things that are non-standard about this edit: 1) a way for a restaurant will usually be the building only and not include the parking area, 2) generally if you make a way for a restaurant, and there's also a node, you should remove the node so that there is only one object in OSM per feature. Hope this helps and happy mapping!

I'm guessing this wasn't really based on the Nepal imagery? :) (see changeset source)

fyi, the fitness stations should be leisure=fitness_station, not amenity=fitness_station