Please don't make changes without surveying - Naptan data is likely inaccurate wrt the actual bus stop signage. If you want to add an "official_name" then please do so, but don't change what's been captured from on the ground surveys.

Btw you probably need to follow the commercial mapping guidelines if you’re not editing in a personal capacity.

You’ve answered your own question. Plus, Yes != yes. And JOSM validator will complains about motor_vehicle=yes on a standard highway — so it’s not just me. If your system is relying on irrelevant, incorrect or redundant tagging then you’ll have to add them to all Bristol roads and increase database size, etc., etc. Plus, other mappers will probably just remove them.

The changes to the over bridge seem to be incorrect - I'll revert them.

access=Yes is meaningless
bicycle=yes is already implicit for UK highways, as is motor_vehicle=yes, foot=yes and horse=yes.

I'll remove the redundant tags

A descriptive changeset comment helps all local mappers - what did you change here? Or was it a mistake and it should be reverted?

Well spotted. I have no reason not to assume it's my typo.

There shouldn't be overlaping ways for the same item - just add "bicycle=yes" to the existing parking lane.

"access=no" means no one can legally access this service road -- which seems odd. Maybe "service=private" was intended?

It seems odd to have a cycleway with "bicycle=no" did you survey this?

I've corrected a long node drag from this changeset -- seems like it might not be the only one.

This looks like a bmx-style racetrack, rather than a track for agricultural vehicles -- did you survey this?

There's no one-way markings visible on satellite imagery, given tree cover. Bing shows it as a cul-de-sac from A366 (necessarily two-way) https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=f70f66a5-0f98-4376-b48c-bcb9533cd932&cp=51.314973~-2.299937&lvl=19&dir=302.45245&pi=-6.536615&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 Mapillary also shows it as a dead end from A366.

From A36 Mapillary shows it as 2-way, as does Bing Streetside https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=7a4e5f6a-6c92-4d49-afba-6db7519997ad&cp=51.318157~-2.309885&lvl=19&dir=137.589&pi=-8.623945&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

This looks like a duplicate of the parking aisle.

A descriptive change set comment helps other mappers especially with ones covering a large area. What did you change?

A descriptive changeset comment helps other local mappers - what did you change?

You’ve removed amenity=hospital so it won’t be considered as a hospital now

Not really a good reason to delete it, just because its private (add access=private) -- but it was definitely a bit rubbish as was -- so have had another go :-)

I don't think many routing apps would notice a wall drawn like that -- might have to break the way and have a real gap, well unless there's a gate or something in the wall.

Seems odd -- it's inside CM3 ?

Some of the landuse seems to overlap other landuse which is unusual -- plus the grass going through the bingo building looks odd?