Hello. way/127453562 contains "Chiosco Cairoli di Alice Marani" in addr:postcode. Is that the name of the building? Or maybe another building? Online I see it might be the name of a flower shop booth but I can't recognize a booth on the imagery.

Hello
Thank you for adding the clinic to the OpenStreetMap database.
Can you correct the wikipedia and wikidata tag? If the place doesn't have a wikipedia page it can be deleted. Can you add the zip code (currently it's set to the city name)?
All the best

Leider nein, waren dort auch nur auf einer Tagestour und sind einer Komoot Route gefolgt.

Ich habe die access Tags der Brücke jetzt auf 'no' gesetzt. Ist sicher nur temporär, der Rest des Weges ist ok.

I assume the value of addr:postcode was some kind of copy&paste error? Or should that go into a 'note' or 'source' field?

Is the "I’ve got isolates: 1 = 105 2 = 490 3 = 461B 4 = 514 5 = 511" a copy&paste mistake? Affects 4 buildings https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=18.66/51.39/-2.40&layer=postcode_bad_format

Hello fellow mapper. How did you determine a house number and postcode for a dog park? I mean parks usually don't have addresses. Is 302 BiSovent Street for the community center real or made up?

Please give other users a good changeset comment. A dot '.' is telling us very little. Even 'batiment' is not telling us what you aimed to change.

Do you know the address of this place? "n/a" is not helpful and I can't find it listed the website. Is this a business people can visit?

Worth a try. Setting it now. Let me know (or revert) if you see rendering breaking.

I use a regular report based on https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=4.15/43.18/-89.07&layer=postcode_bad_format and I would've noticed if many masts had wrong (not 5 or 5+4 digits) format. No need to go through your edit history.

I reverted this changeset now. Still not sure how to solve it.

It's more related to universities which have many buildings across a larger area. There is a discussion in https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/discussions/3418#discussioncomment-9379380 (where I argue the same: there's already a boundary=site in another relation and this one should probably be a multipolygon again). I have no objection to revert.

For node/147621678, is "2112206" another type of identifier? It's not a postcode, those would be in the 523xx range around this area.

OSM relation/130935 already has the NUTS code PL9, and it's the same boundary. Is another relation really needed?

Can you review the postcode of this place? I think it's this business https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/774466 (All data is from Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme Data is released under the Open Government Licence (v3) so afaik it's usable for OSM).

Hello. Can you explain why way/1238633639 has the URL of a another provider as the name? Is data copied from other map providers?

Can you review the postcode of way/294668651 again? On https://www.coop.se/butiker-erbjudanden/coop/coop-lesjofors/ clicking "Om butiken" I see the address is "Bergslagsgatan 70, 68260 Lesjöfors"
Of course they might have the wrong postcode on their website, that happens, too.

Great, I was just surprised because usually it would be many keystrokes. I'm looking after wrong data in addr:postcode and it came up in one of my reports. Happy mapping

What happened to node/11817888797 ? All values are empty (dots). Is that somewhat automated?