Changeset When Comment
30491804

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

30843147

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

31227736

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

31228303

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

30300720

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

31388676

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

31944593

ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at changeset/58552383

31944593

I'll have a look at this (and the other changesets) tonight after work.

58148067

OK, thanks. I've fixed a couple in my last changeset.

58148067

I'm currently doing some edits around the Tamworth region, and noticed you have added some 'surface=paved' tags to dirt roads. I'll be fixing the ones I come across (will be uploading in 1-2 days once I finish going through my voice recordings), but thought I should let you know.

31944593

It's been a couple of years since I've been there, but I think there might have been a sign directing cyclists to use the adjacent footbridge. I don't have the voice recordings made that far back to check. It may have changed since then.

33569174

I've just checked the signs for the creek crossings. Larras Lee Road has 'Jews Creek'. Banjo Paterson Way has 'Norah Creek' (with the 'h'). Burgoon Lane doesn't have any signs. I'll add an 'old_name=Norah Creek' tag to the creek.

46516721

Thanks.

46516721

Regarding way/478036874 - I walked past the southern end of this way last week but didn't see anything. (I didn't go past the northern end.) Could you please confirm the source for this way? It's not on the LPI base map, or on the map on the signs at the start of the walk. Thanks.

45713748

I presume you are referring to node/438645423
Just had a look - my first thought was that I was adding the altitude of the peak, based on an information board - however the elevation information was already there! I'm assuming I had selected the node to copy the spelling, but must have forgotten to deselect it when I added the information board (which is definitely not on the peak). I've now removed those tags (see changeset changeset/49149403). Thanks for picking up the error.

47328577

Could you please have a look at some of the additions in this changeset? Some of them are paths (probably OK), but some sections are tagged as motorway, also some nearby paths are mapped as secondary and tertiary roads (aerial views look like paths). For further info, have a look at highway=* .

21475256

If you stay behind the cliff then it is a lifeline!
These nodes were positioned from GPS, with names from the nearby signs. The positions of Malaita Point and Eagle Hawk Lookout on the LPI map are incorrect. (If you look at the LPI imagery, you can just make out the car park for the actual location of Eagle Hawk Lookout.)

45852136

I'm just making it clear that these edits are based on information obtained while visiting Europe in person.

45394426

I'm just making it clear that these edits are based on information obtained while visiting Berlin in person.

46018768

I have been thinking about this changeset over the last couple of months. I revisited the duplicate ways at changeset changeset/46547845 and I was going to let you know here at the time, but to be honest I couldn't be bothered. In fact I couldn't be bothered with OSM at all up until now (I had some local edits to do but didn't feel like doing them until now). The reason is that I was unhappy about some of the comments made here.
To be clear, I am not talking about issues regarding tagging changes. What I am talking about is the accusation that I deleted objects without checking (when I was actually deleting duplicates). Christopher had the decency to ask what I had done. Nakaner on the other hand accused me of deleting the bus platform at Schönefeld and a mystery building in Strausberg. He asked the rhetorical question 'do you have local knowledge' (implying that as I'm editing from Australia I couldn't possibly know). He then questioned my other recent edits as being 'mechanical by definition' - I take this to mean my previous changesets (the ones marked 'from Europe holiday' - i.e. I had actually been there).
I didn't say anything at the time as I thought it best to leave it, but unfortunately I wasn't able to stop thinking about it. After this comment, I am not planning to say any more on this topic.