OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
158903703

Lieben Dank! 🙏

158856868

Correct, the signs are clear.

158856868

That doesn't matter. After every turn, the meaning of the signs is always removed.
And the way from the north, from the east and from the south are only signposted as shared foot and cycle paths (AT:52.17a-a). The other paths leading there are correctly marked and signposted as they are and not changed from my side.

158856868

The first picture you linked shows the driveway to the allotments which is tagged as unclassified here: way/1144925210

The second one is a totally different way and was never changed by myself: way/442604636

158856868

In general, we should follow the main sign when tagging something like this. If it's actually a shared footpath/cycle path, then just path, if it's a dirt road with a ban on motor vehicles, then just track.
And a footpath with bicycle=yes doesn't become a path either.
But anyway, in this case, there are no such signs.

158856868

okay, first location should be here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810729587830619&lat=47.3919113&lng=9.68045&z=18.355836900751235&focus=photo&x=0.6250134462746177&y=0.5181897547033589&zoom=0
Second one here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3726604904273858&lat=47.3783275&lng=9.6734293&z=19.160497282455516&focus=photo&x=0.05535315256168016&y=0.4714495194653372&zoom=2.743108338115388
And the third one here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=180002684415921&focus=photo&lat=47.395482899972&lng=9.6700672&z=17&x=0.7463342849624341&y=0.14452580635753912&zoom=1.5887024964469805

Where did you spot the additional signs there?

158856868

Where is this additional “agricultural traffic free” sign supposed to be? I've just gone through my mapillary photos from the summer and can't find one either in the north at the Schmitterbrücke bridge nor in the south at the customs in Hohenems.
Or check this one in the middle: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=810729587830619
way/1169123130

Do you have photos of the signage you think you know there?

158856868

The traffic sign tool has a different opinion and links to the same page: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240,1026-36
I just asked in the OSM chat and they also think that highway=path is correct. My understanding of the situation is that the proportion of traffic should be taken into account and there is definitely more bicycle and pedestrian traffic on this path than agricultural traffic.

158856868

Can you guide me to the wiki section where this is defined?

155647255

These changes have been reverted as no response has been received and the incorrect change has not been corrected.

changeset/158857143

158487043

Korrektur: changeset/158856759

158146728

Link zum Wiki noch: osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified

158146728

Grüß dich. Ein highway=unclassified bezeichnet Straßen mit "erheblichen Durchgangsverkehr". Da sich es hier um eine Sackgasse handelt, kann kein Durchgangsverkehr stattfinden. Da es sich lediglich um eine Zufahrt zu zwei Häusern handelt, war "highway=service" bereits völlig korrekt.

157899267

Bitte nicht als Kritik verstehen, aber es hilft bei der Kontrolle von Changesets sehr, wenn diese generell etwas kleiner gestaltet sind. Ich wĂĽrde mich freuen, wenn du das zukĂĽnftig zumindest mitberĂĽcksichtigen wĂĽrdest. Danke dir!

157871272

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

157876841

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

157877002

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

158009119

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

157797666

Ups, in diesem Changeset ist einiges schief gegangen. Der Citytunnel wurde mehrfach mit oberirdischen Straßen verbunden, die es nicht gibt. An diesen nicht vorhandenen Verbindungen wurden sogar Fußgängerüberwege eingetragen.
Der Citytunnel ist auch ein motorway_link statt einer secondary.

Alle Fehler wurden behoben: changeset/158846687

Bitte zukĂĽnftiger vorsichtiger sein oder kurz vorher im Forum nachfragen: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/at/59

158104967

Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!